From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76822C433E2 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:58:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C826221E5 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:58:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="fDUbtAE+" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0C826221E5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:41884 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIUDJ-0007d5-1t for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 05:58:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54144) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIU8n-0000ed-4G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 05:54:17 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:57200 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIU8l-0000nG-06 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 05:54:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600250054; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CgzW+ofsCKVWBaStkUDLhIDaMLB1w42HIUuF0SLQxHg=; b=fDUbtAE+WwTQbhgSVBHzd5UPs+pmRo1XQi6rG+qBSVGkB8Th/vXjnoLutUryAHblslaQ1S ZTC42rUUz4dghmHICJWlRJC+IJAqWEAKuUzMbCaKObSeRDZ6DuP5Ereh6B2CGY0CJJCAy3 1mohNlu3T4cI68PDdS1pxmQDxxDOSQw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-473-oUQS7D3AM2OuQb7lXshbGg-1; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 05:54:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: oUQS7D3AM2OuQb7lXshbGg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77AF381C463; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-113-248.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.248]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A77C60BFA; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:54:02 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Thomas Huth Subject: Re: Python 3.5 EOL; when can require 3.6? Message-ID: <20200916095402.GI1535709@redhat.com> References: <875z8eupyp.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <1ad049f0-09f9-d56f-bc63-d120a0dbcf24@redhat.com> <20200916083327.GE1535709@redhat.com> <91372bbf-bb36-2ade-c8a4-7e1f8b0776ea@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <91372bbf-bb36-2ade-c8a4-7e1f8b0776ea@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.211.31.81; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/16 02:41:36 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -50 X-Spam_score: -5.1 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-2.999, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: Peter Maydell , Eduardo Habkost , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Michael Roth , Markus Armbruster , John Snow , Stefan Hajnoczi , Cleber Rosa , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:50:06AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 16/09/2020 10.33, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:54:32AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > >> On 16/09/2020 09.43, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >>> We require Python 3.5. It will reach its "end of life" at the end of > >>> September 2020[*]. Any reason not to require 3.6 for 5.2? qemu-iotests > >>> already does for its Python parts. > >> > >> I think the only reason for requiring Python 3.5 is that we still use > >> Ubuntu Xenial in Travis. We don't support Xenial according to our > >> support policy anymore, but we did not update to Bionic there since it > >> has that broken version of libssh. > >> > >> Fortunately, since a couple of weeks, Travis now supports Focal, too, so > >> once we switched our .travis.yml to use Focal, I think we could start > >> requiring Python 3.6. > > > > Note we really should not be constrained by what Travis provides as > > images. Travis images provide docker, so we can spawn our Travis > > jobs inside containers to get arbitrary linux distros. We did this > > for libvirt for a while until we switched to GitLab CI. So we > > definitely don't need to care about Xenial from a Travis POV no > > matter what. > > I hope we could finally exploit the possibility to use KVM on Travis ... > that won't be possible anymore once we use containers there. Do they forbid passing the /dev/kvm device node into the docker container ? I would have though that would be allowed, since using KVM inside docker is no worse than using it outside docker in the Travis env. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|