[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/20] net/ena/base: specify operations of rte_delay

[Michal Krawczyk <mk@semihalf.com>]

ENA_MSLEEP() and ENA_UDELAY() were expecting different behavior - the
first one is expecting driver to sleep, while the other, to busy wait.

For both cases, the rte_delay_(u|m)s() function was used, which could
be either sleep or block, depending on the configuration.

To make the macros valid, the operations should be specified directly.
Because of that, the rte_delay_us_sleep() and rte_delay_us_block() are
now being used.

Fixes: 9ba7981ec992 ("ena: add communication layer for DPDK")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Michal Krawczyk <mk@semihalf.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Chauskin <igorch@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Guy Tzalik <gtzalik@amazon.com>
---
 drivers/net/ena/base/ena_plat_dpdk.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ena/base/ena_plat_dpdk.h b/drivers/net/ena/base/ena_plat_dpdk.h
index ba7a098f59..d9b728c4d6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ena/base/ena_plat_dpdk.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ena/base/ena_plat_dpdk.h
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ typedef uint64_t dma_addr_t;
 
 #define ENA_ABORT() abort()
 
-#define ENA_MSLEEP(x) rte_delay_ms(x)
-#define ENA_UDELAY(x) rte_delay_us(x)
+#define ENA_MSLEEP(x) rte_delay_us_sleep(x * 1000)
+#define ENA_UDELAY(x) rte_delay_us_block(x)
 
 #define ENA_TOUCH(x) ((void)(x))
 #define memcpy_toio memcpy
-- 
2.25.1