All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	gprocida@google.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ehci-hcd: Move include to keep CRC stable
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 12:44:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200917114411.GB3897889@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200916171825.3228122-1-qperret@google.com>

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 06:18:25PM +0100, Quentin Perret wrote:
>The CRC calculation done by genksyms is triggered when the parser hits
>EXPORT_SYMBOL*() macros. At this point, genksyms recursively expands the
>types of the function parameters, and uses that as the input for the CRC
>calculation. In the case of forward-declared structs, the type expands
>to 'UNKNOWN'. Following this, it appears that the result of the
>expansion of each type is cached somewhere, and seems to be re-used
>when/if the same type is seen again for another exported symbol in the
>same C file.
>
>Unfortunately, this can cause CRC 'stability' issues when a struct
>definition becomes visible in the middle of a C file. For example, let's
>assume code with the following pattern:
>
>    struct foo;
>
>    int bar(struct foo *arg)
>    {
>	/* Do work ... */
>    }
>    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bar);
>
>    /* This contains struct foo's definition */
>    #include "foo.h"
>
>    int baz(struct foo *arg)
>    {
>	/* Do more work ... */
>    }
>    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(baz);
>
>Here, baz's CRC will be computed using the expansion of struct foo that
>was cached after bar's CRC calculation ('UNKOWN' here). But if
>EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bar) is removed from the file (because of e.g. symbol
>trimming using CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS), struct foo will be expanded
>late, during baz's CRC calculation, which now has visibility over the
>full struct definition, hence resulting in a different CRC for baz.
>
>The proper fix for this certainly is in genksyms, but that will take me
>some time to get right. In the meantime, we have seen one occurrence of
>this in the ehci-hcd code which hits this problem because of the way it
>includes C files halfway through the code together with an unlucky mix
>of symbol trimming.
>
>In order to workaround this, move the include done in ehci-hub.c early
>in ehci-hcd.c, hence making sure the struct definitions are visible to
>the entire file. This improves CRC stability of the ehci-hcd exports
>even when symbol trimming is enabled.
>
>Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com>

Cheers,
Matthias

>---
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c | 1 +
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-hub.c | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
>index 6257be4110ca..3575b7201881 100644
>--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
>+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
>@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/usb.h>
> #include <linux/usb/hcd.h>
>+#include <linux/usb/otg.h>
> #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hub.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hub.c
>index ce0eaf7d7c12..087402aec5cb 100644
>--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hub.c
>+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hub.c
>@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
>  */
>
> /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>-#include <linux/usb/otg.h>
>
> #define	PORT_WAKE_BITS	(PORT_WKOC_E|PORT_WKDISC_E|PORT_WKCONN_E)
>
>-- 
>2.28.0.618.gf4bc123cb7-goog
>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-17 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-16 17:18 [PATCH] ehci-hcd: Move include to keep CRC stable Quentin Perret
2020-09-16 17:31 ` Greg KH
2020-09-16 17:32   ` Greg KH
2020-09-16 20:16     ` Alan Stern
2020-09-17 11:44 ` Matthias Maennich [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200917114411.GB3897889@google.com \
    --to=maennich@google.com \
    --cc=gprocida@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.