From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94938C43461 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADCF21734 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="hK1ItdSA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727039AbgIQNCR (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:02:17 -0400 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:37986 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727026AbgIQNBd (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:01:33 -0400 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 08HD0Yrc059673; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1600347634; bh=228i3kO/ePj4BLGku9Pm9IqvyA00dorq9WbjfzFVaQ4=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=hK1ItdSApIqf0Ze7IciwXSSrujBEszcNjhN7MeBimRALTflBfYIHhgEtY788X4zO7 jyyHus7bmAiHy5p7spvohl2zM11uUq3Ebg8ROQHAHBuynwXJSimAzMDlbu17rxG/Yi YsQpqZCm3q3+HxQPKuEfKCKRmiFmFvqMWXb8vzDc= Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (dfle104.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.25]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08HD0YYH026740 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:34 -0500 Received: from DFLE107.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.28) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:33 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE107.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:33 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 08HD0XfG057556; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:33 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:33 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon To: Peter Rosin CC: Roger Quadros , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: mux-j7200-wiz: Add lane function defines Message-ID: <20200917130033.5totdf6mdg3lbbmq@akan> References: <20200915112038.30219-1-rogerq@ti.com> <20200915112038.30219-2-rogerq@ti.com> <20200916154536.m552ft2jzfsaeokr@akan> <20200917122703.ojuzn6b3tvqbnssc@akan> <02d57a88-ba7a-5944-8053-8f4ad03242d2@axentia.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <02d57a88-ba7a-5944-8053-8f4ad03242d2@axentia.se> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14:53-20200917, Peter Rosin wrote: [..] > I do not have a tree and dt-patches should normally not go *through* me. yep. > But I'd still like to see what's happening. > I did not realize this was going to cause a *lot* of churn in the dt > files. How bad can it be when the file is new in this cycle? And is it > worth it? But it seems you all see problems with the current naming and > in that case it must surely be better to fix it early? yes - I think I can figure it out. > > And if it's a lot, maybe it needs to be more than one patch? I get the > feeling this will need to be taken care of by someone other than me, > because I'm just the maintainer of a very small subsystem and I don't > normally have to deal with "big" issues involving several trees. I would > be a bottleneck. No a pain, I think I can help get it through, may be, I worry too much.. Lets see how the cleanup series looks like. Roger: I am not touching the j7200 series till we cleanup j721e as discussed in this thread. please use 5.9-rc1 as your baseline for cleanup. Once available, we can figure out how to get 5.10-rc1 staged items later. Window is narrowing rather soon, so appreciate a quick cleaup :). -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84943C43461 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 324F02083B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="FwsAvgVz"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="hK1ItdSA" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 324F02083B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=7uGOQEU2cef0RInSy5DammapxiaiQ/BSHOwgc6+JupA=; b=FwsAvgVziYY8EzNCzKQkjVCso aohF34PZeMTFtNcTuf45Cvycr9Lc66MY4ORfQmz1gOqQvGZBrlYht8B5CaKfGrJ6ZoH35AdQks1+h IgxLo74wOQBlmJ8JLq91szTxPbzu/SoKDmWnahmKEvSsKEB5lD+4xtMgTpMhVhCUAytO0RrQPmyNO qe/3gvOP+dk+fCZ7th5EvMUpVx74W83T0MkXLMfm0hAr84p8ntm4LjPcvFtiMcNCtRx9cPr7Rj1qk DIFgdhSLqtfuxmBHLP0YhWakBw8FuLyRLsd0hW5YKJmzDY3/So2vmBf7ngCjk4JSAuXHub0o+BI10 1816VFEUw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kItWj-0007xx-FT; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:00:41 +0000 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kItWh-0007xd-0E for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:00:39 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 08HD0Yrc059673; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1600347634; bh=228i3kO/ePj4BLGku9Pm9IqvyA00dorq9WbjfzFVaQ4=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=hK1ItdSApIqf0Ze7IciwXSSrujBEszcNjhN7MeBimRALTflBfYIHhgEtY788X4zO7 jyyHus7bmAiHy5p7spvohl2zM11uUq3Ebg8ROQHAHBuynwXJSimAzMDlbu17rxG/Yi YsQpqZCm3q3+HxQPKuEfKCKRmiFmFvqMWXb8vzDc= Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (dfle104.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.25]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08HD0YYH026740 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:34 -0500 Received: from DFLE107.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.28) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:33 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE107.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:33 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 08HD0XfG057556; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:33 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:33 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon To: Peter Rosin Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: mux-j7200-wiz: Add lane function defines Message-ID: <20200917130033.5totdf6mdg3lbbmq@akan> References: <20200915112038.30219-1-rogerq@ti.com> <20200915112038.30219-2-rogerq@ti.com> <20200916154536.m552ft2jzfsaeokr@akan> <20200917122703.ojuzn6b3tvqbnssc@akan> <02d57a88-ba7a-5944-8053-8f4ad03242d2@axentia.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <02d57a88-ba7a-5944-8053-8f4ad03242d2@axentia.se> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200917_090039_134663_30EFDE42 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.39 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, nsekhar@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kishon@ti.com, t-kristo@ti.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Roger Quadros Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 14:53-20200917, Peter Rosin wrote: [..] > I do not have a tree and dt-patches should normally not go *through* me. yep. > But I'd still like to see what's happening. > I did not realize this was going to cause a *lot* of churn in the dt > files. How bad can it be when the file is new in this cycle? And is it > worth it? But it seems you all see problems with the current naming and > in that case it must surely be better to fix it early? yes - I think I can figure it out. > > And if it's a lot, maybe it needs to be more than one patch? I get the > feeling this will need to be taken care of by someone other than me, > because I'm just the maintainer of a very small subsystem and I don't > normally have to deal with "big" issues involving several trees. I would > be a bottleneck. No a pain, I think I can help get it through, may be, I worry too much.. Lets see how the cleanup series looks like. Roger: I am not touching the j7200 series till we cleanup j721e as discussed in this thread. please use 5.9-rc1 as your baseline for cleanup. Once available, we can figure out how to get 5.10-rc1 staged items later. Window is narrowing rather soon, so appreciate a quick cleaup :). -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel