From: peterz@infradead.org
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>, Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] locking/percpu-rwsem: use this_cpu_{inc|dec}() for read_count
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:22:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200917132230.GG1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200917124838.GT5449@casper.infradead.org>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:48:38PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 02:01:33PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > IIUC, file_end_write() was never IRQ safe (at least if !CONFIG_SMP), even
> > before 8129ed2964 ("change sb_writers to use percpu_rw_semaphore"), but this
> > doesn't matter...
> >
> > Perhaps we can change aio.c, io_uring.c and fs/overlayfs/file.c to avoid
> > file_end_write() in IRQ context, but I am not sure it's worth the trouble.
>
> If we change bio_endio to invoke the ->bi_end_io callbacks in softirq
> context instead of hardirq context, we can change the pagecache to take
SoftIRQ context has exactly the same problem vs __this_cpu*().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-15 14:07 [RFC PATCH] locking/percpu-rwsem: use this_cpu_{inc|dec}() for read_count Hou Tao
2020-09-15 15:06 ` peterz
2020-09-15 15:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-15 15:51 ` peterz
2020-09-15 16:03 ` peterz
2020-09-15 16:11 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 18:11 ` peterz
2020-09-16 8:20 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-15 16:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-16 12:32 ` Hou Tao
2020-09-16 12:51 ` peterz
2020-09-17 8:48 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-24 11:55 ` Hou Tao
2020-09-29 17:49 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-29 18:07 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-17 10:51 ` Boaz Harrosh
2020-09-17 12:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-17 12:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-17 13:22 ` peterz [this message]
2020-09-17 13:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-17 13:46 ` Boaz Harrosh
2020-09-17 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 9:07 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-18 10:01 ` peterz
2020-09-18 10:04 ` peterz
2020-09-18 10:07 ` peterz
2020-09-18 10:12 ` peterz
2020-09-18 10:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-18 11:03 ` peterz
2020-09-18 13:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-09-18 13:26 ` Jan Kara
2020-09-20 23:49 ` Dave Chinner
2020-09-18 8:36 ` [tip: locking/urgent] locking/percpu-rwsem: Use this_cpu_{inc,dec}() " tip-bot2 for Hou Tao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200917132230.GG1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=boaz@plexistor.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.