From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 23:14:45 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [git commit] package/libseccomp: bump version to 2.4.4 Message-ID: <20200917210557.A40868B874@busybox.osuosl.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net commit: https://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=2ff81c925dc56b8a0d213fa27eed35fd8a189bd4 branch: https://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=refs/heads/master Brings support for 5.8 syscalls and adds various fixes. Drop 0001-remove-static.patch as it is upstream since 2.4.3: https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/commit/2a1b67825842c6c75ca898f09f0d9c99339e1fa8 Drop 0002-Circumvent-bug-in-uClibc-ng-syscall-on-x86_64-system.patch as the uClibc-ng issue is fixed in 1.0.33: https://cgit.uclibc-ng.org/cgi/cgit/uclibc-ng.git/commit/?id=01e863c89fc772a406fe56c6dddb39f71a570c06 Download upstream uploaded tarball rather than using the github macro, and use upstream hash and reformat hash file. This allows to drop AUTORECONF = YES. Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni --- package/libseccomp/0001-remove-static.patch | 40 ----------- ...bug-in-uClibc-ng-syscall-on-x86_64-system.patch | 80 ---------------------- package/libseccomp/libseccomp.hash | 5 +- package/libseccomp/libseccomp.mk | 5 +- 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-) diff --git a/package/libseccomp/0001-remove-static.patch b/package/libseccomp/0001-remove-static.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 60a1ff00b6..0000000000 --- a/package/libseccomp/0001-remove-static.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,40 +0,0 @@ -From 5d010fb06eae43b284e5ccc322f6de47eb42b751 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Fabrice Fontaine -Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:45:22 +0200 -Subject: [PATCH] remove static - -Do not force static link of tools, it breaks build with: -BR2_SHARED_LIBS=y - -Patch retrieved from -https://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/tree/package/libseccomp/0001-remove-static.patch -and slighly updated to work with 2.3.3 - -[Upstream status: https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/pull/121] - -Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls -Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine -[Peter: updated for v2.4.0 which adds scmp_api_level] -Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard ---- - tools/Makefile.am | 3 --- - 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/tools/Makefile.am b/tools/Makefile.am -index f768365..5f9d571 100644 ---- a/tools/Makefile.am -+++ b/tools/Makefile.am -@@ -37,10 +37,7 @@ scmp_bpf_sim_SOURCES = scmp_bpf_sim.c bpf.h util.h - scmp_api_level_SOURCES = scmp_api_level.c - - scmp_sys_resolver_LDADD = ../src/libseccomp.la --scmp_sys_resolver_LDFLAGS = -static - scmp_arch_detect_LDADD = ../src/libseccomp.la --scmp_arch_detect_LDFLAGS = -static - scmp_bpf_disasm_LDADD = util.la - scmp_bpf_sim_LDADD = util.la - scmp_api_level_LDADD = ../src/libseccomp.la --scmp_api_level_LDFLAGS = -static --- -2.11.0 - diff --git a/package/libseccomp/0002-Circumvent-bug-in-uClibc-ng-syscall-on-x86_64-system.patch b/package/libseccomp/0002-Circumvent-bug-in-uClibc-ng-syscall-on-x86_64-system.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 6ac9b08a76..0000000000 --- a/package/libseccomp/0002-Circumvent-bug-in-uClibc-ng-syscall-on-x86_64-system.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,80 +0,0 @@ -From 613e601bb4b50dc359b41f162a5b629449e4bbea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Carlos Santos -Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 22:02:49 -0300 -Subject: [PATCH] Circumvent bug in uClibc-ng syscall() on x86_64 systems - -On uClibc at least up to v1.0.32, syscall() for x86_64 is defined in -libc/sysdeps/linux/x86_64/syscall.S as - -syscall: - movq %rdi, %rax /* Syscall number -> rax. */ - movq %rsi, %rdi /* shift arg1 - arg5. */ - movq %rdx, %rsi - movq %rcx, %rdx - movq %r8, %r10 - movq %r9, %r8 - movq 8(%rsp),%r9 /* arg6 is on the stack. */ - syscall /* Do the system call. */ - cmpq $-4095, %rax /* Check %rax for error. */ - jae __syscall_error /* Branch forward if it failed. */ - ret /* Return to caller. */ - -And __syscall_error is defined in -libc/sysdeps/linux/x86_64/__syscall_error.c as - -int __syscall_error(void) attribute_hidden; -int __syscall_error(void) -{ - register int err_no __asm__ ("%rcx"); - __asm__ ("mov %rax, %rcx\n\t" - "neg %rcx"); - __set_errno(err_no); - return -1; -} - -Notice that __syscall_error returns -1 as a 32-bit int in %rax, a 64-bit -register i.e. 0x00000000ffffffff (decimal 4294967295). When this value -is compared to -1 in _sys_chk_seccomp_flag_kernel() the result is false, -leading the function to always return 0. - -Prevent the error by coercing the return value of syscall() to int in a -temporary variable before comparing it to -1. We could use just an (int) -cast but the variable makes the code more readable and the machine code -generated by the compiler is the same in both cases. - -All other syscall() invocations were inspected and they either already -coerce the result to int or do not compare it to -1. - -The same problem probably occurs on other 64-bit systems but so far only -x86_64 was tested. - -A bug report is being submitted to uClibc. - -Signed-off-by: Carlos Santos ---- - src/system.c | 8 +++++--- - 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/src/system.c b/src/system.c -index 8e5aafc..811b401 100644 ---- a/src/system.c -+++ b/src/system.c -@@ -215,10 +215,12 @@ static int _sys_chk_seccomp_flag_kernel(int flag) - /* this is an invalid seccomp(2) call because the last argument - * is NULL, but depending on the errno value of EFAULT we can - * guess if the filter flag is supported or not */ -- if (sys_chk_seccomp_syscall() == 1 && -- syscall(_nr_seccomp, SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL) == -1 && -- errno == EFAULT) -+ int rc; -+ if (sys_chk_seccomp_syscall() == 1) { -+ rc = syscall(_nr_seccomp, SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL); -+ if (rc == -1 && errno == EFAULT) - return 1; -+ } - - return 0; - } --- -2.18.1 - diff --git a/package/libseccomp/libseccomp.hash b/package/libseccomp/libseccomp.hash index 39c5f8aa38..2d07c1c1fa 100644 --- a/package/libseccomp/libseccomp.hash +++ b/package/libseccomp/libseccomp.hash @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +# From https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/releases/tag/v2.4.4 +sha256 4e79738d1ef3c9b7ca9769f1f8b8d84fc17143c2c1c432e53b9c64787e0ff3eb libseccomp-2.4.4.tar.gz # Locally calculated -sha256 36aa502c0461ae9efc6c93ec2430d6badd9bf91ecbe73806baf7b7c6f687ab4f libseccomp-2.4.1.tar.gz -sha256 102900208eef27b766380135906d431dba87edaa7ec6aa72e6ebd3dd67f3a97b LICENSE +sha256 102900208eef27b766380135906d431dba87edaa7ec6aa72e6ebd3dd67f3a97b LICENSE diff --git a/package/libseccomp/libseccomp.mk b/package/libseccomp/libseccomp.mk index 491e51b375..cea3d28604 100644 --- a/package/libseccomp/libseccomp.mk +++ b/package/libseccomp/libseccomp.mk @@ -4,11 +4,10 @@ # ################################################################################ -LIBSECCOMP_VERSION = 2.4.1 -LIBSECCOMP_SITE = $(call github,seccomp,libseccomp,v$(LIBSECCOMP_VERSION)) +LIBSECCOMP_VERSION = 2.4.4 +LIBSECCOMP_SITE = https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/releases/download/v$(LIBSECCOMP_VERSION) LIBSECCOMP_LICENSE = LGPL-2.1 LIBSECCOMP_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE LIBSECCOMP_INSTALL_STAGING = YES -LIBSECCOMP_AUTORECONF = YES $(eval $(autotools-package))