From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516C3C4346E for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:09:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7032C21D91 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:09:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7032C21D91 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=fuzziesquirrel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BwDX51S32zDqdD for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 05:09:41 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=fuzziesquirrel.com (client-ip=173.167.31.197; helo=bajor.fuzziesquirrel.com; envelope-from=bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=fuzziesquirrel.com Received: from bajor.fuzziesquirrel.com (mail.fuzziesquirrel.com [173.167.31.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BwDVR28B2zDqhm for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 05:08:15 +1000 (AEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fuzziesquirrel.com Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:08:10 -0400 From: Brad Bishop To: Ed Tanous Subject: Re: interest in a minimal image recipe Message-ID: <20200921190810.5qtx62u472htt4bi@thinkpad.fuzziesquirrel.com> References: <20200915202832.rq3os62pdj7mzaco@thinkpad.fuzziesquirrel.com> <20200921125540.4d6amvus3wt57igg@thinkpad.fuzziesquirrel.com> <20200921175227.zmdjbmixbwvstd4m@thinkpad.fuzziesquirrel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: OpenBMC Maillist Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:25:34AM -0700, Ed Tanous wrote: >That's a really good point. We really ought to model features as >outbound interfaces that drive internal RDEPENDS. Ideally nobody >would be appending entity-manager, they would be appending >intel-ipmi-oem (or whatever name we pick for it in the future), which >would have the correct dependencies on entity-manager. I like it. Right. And I guess this highlights an issue with a different patch of mine: https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/36510 - I had wanted to put EM in my images to do some prototyping with it but there are better ways to do that (via dependency or maybe local.conf).