From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4524C4727C for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F90821548 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728384AbgIVEh6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:37:58 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:43032 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726492AbgIVEhz (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:37:55 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 4D5D86736F; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 06:37:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 06:37:52 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Palmer Dabbelt , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Arnd Bergmann Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Paul Walmsley , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: remove set_fs for riscv v2 Message-ID: <20200922043752.GA29151@lst.de> References: <20200907055825.1917151-1-hch@lst.de> <20200909065515.GA9618@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200909065515.GA9618@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Given tht we've not made much progress with the common branch, are you fine just picking this up through the riscv tree for 5.10? I'll defer other architectures that depend on the common changes to 5.11 then. On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > now that we've sorted out a remaining issue base.set_fs should not > be rebased any more, so you could pull it into the riscv tree or a topic > branch. > > The first four patch should go into base.set_fs, though. Arnd, can you > re-review the updated patches? ---end quoted text--- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4F0C4363D for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AF1D21548 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="mG48UfRu" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1AF1D21548 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=C6gIUyzH1BfmZYvxhVxfYzdu2H3hJWnkF1CY2YeXdng=; b=mG48UfRunIalVU30eBQSL9Zm/ 7N1bOFpuNuliRuSAC3PzZafWxzrQjqv2Zc+ilV7OfwSq0eMxELypRHY6H0m96/2j1GTWDP3U12Ay3 UQmi4TJCvfzQAqbeGT9DLRvpu5kCpS07pswVALUtoq0sIKFJXayTaFZXopwsGXKdavNGA7fQfuv3m BCk8nWwzxO8Z9fHVRphtZ7dGoC1WwYuLWt9ZC/l8jNipAaZuwGCdajVfgUE+HnIOUtFML1xSkVGJH SdEjPrOnoOaMeRThNxIZCPmK4M/pKjTR+di8bfW1hTe9UvKxYF7MMVeXsDvqT1gh9DBdBXYDzqSwe FKetaT7QA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kKa3z-00045N-Ej; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:37:59 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kKa3x-00044G-MO for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:37:58 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 4D5D86736F; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 06:37:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 06:37:52 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Palmer Dabbelt , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: remove set_fs for riscv v2 Message-ID: <20200922043752.GA29151@lst.de> References: <20200907055825.1917151-1-hch@lst.de> <20200909065515.GA9618@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200909065515.GA9618@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200922_003757_856924_B32417D5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.92 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig , Paul Walmsley Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Given tht we've not made much progress with the common branch, are you fine just picking this up through the riscv tree for 5.10? I'll defer other architectures that depend on the common changes to 5.11 then. On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > now that we've sorted out a remaining issue base.set_fs should not > be rebased any more, so you could pull it into the riscv tree or a topic > branch. > > The first four patch should go into base.set_fs, though. Arnd, can you > re-review the updated patches? ---end quoted text--- _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv