All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] clk: qcom: gdsc: enable external switchable power domain
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 09:42:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200923144212.GB40811@yoga> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200911130950.578483-3-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

On Fri 11 Sep 08:09 CDT 2020, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:

> Some GDSCs (SM8250's MDSS_GDSC for example) need switchable power domain
> to be on to be able to access hardware registers. Use dev_pm/opp to
                           ^
What you describe here ----+ sounds like the GDSC controller is part of
the power-domain specified and hence needs to be enabled in order to
control the GDSC.

But in contrast what the patch implements is a mechanism where the
GDSC power-domain is a child of some other power-domain. So the commit
message needs to better reflect what's implemented.

Then looking at the DT representation I think it says that the
controller sits in the specified power-domain, rather than the exposed
power-domain...

> enable corresponding power domain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h |  5 ++++
>  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
> index bfc4ac02f9ea..a522e062a79a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/ktime.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/reset-controller.h>
> @@ -110,13 +111,31 @@ static int gdsc_poll_status(struct gdsc *sc, enum gdsc_status status)
>  	return -ETIMEDOUT;
>  }
>  
> +int gdsc_toggle_on(struct gdsc *sc)

This should be "static" and I think you should include "supply" in the
name to denote that it doesn't turn on the gdsc, but rather its supply.

> +{
> +	if (sc->rsupply)
> +		return regulator_enable(sc->rsupply);
> +	if (sc->pd_dev)
> +		return dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(sc->pd_dev, sc->pd_opp);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int gdsc_toggle_off(struct gdsc *sc)
> +{
> +	if (sc->pd_dev)
> +		return dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(sc->pd_dev, 0);
> +	if (sc->rsupply)
> +		return regulator_disable(sc->rsupply);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int gdsc_toggle_logic(struct gdsc *sc, enum gdsc_status status)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  	u32 val = (status == GDSC_ON) ? 0 : SW_COLLAPSE_MASK;
>  
> -	if (status == GDSC_ON && sc->rsupply) {
> -		ret = regulator_enable(sc->rsupply);
> +	if (status == GDSC_ON) {
> +		ret = gdsc_toggle_on(sc);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
> @@ -153,8 +172,8 @@ static int gdsc_toggle_logic(struct gdsc *sc, enum gdsc_status status)
>  	ret = gdsc_poll_status(sc, status);
>  	WARN(ret, "%s status stuck at 'o%s'", sc->pd.name, status ? "ff" : "n");
>  
> -	if (!ret && status == GDSC_OFF && sc->rsupply) {
> -		ret = regulator_disable(sc->rsupply);
> +	if (!ret && status == GDSC_OFF) {
> +		ret = gdsc_toggle_off(sc);
>  		if (ret < 0)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
> @@ -407,6 +426,27 @@ int gdsc_register(struct gdsc_desc *desc,
>  			return PTR_ERR(scs[i]->rsupply);
>  	}
>  
> +	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> +		if (!scs[i] || !scs[i]->domain)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		scs[i]->pd_opp = of_get_required_opp_performance_state(dev->of_node, scs[i]->perf_idx);
> +		if (scs[i]->pd_opp < 0)
> +			return scs[i]->pd_opp;
> +
> +		scs[i]->pd_dev = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(dev, scs[i]->domain);
> +		if (IS_ERR(scs[i]->pd_dev)) {
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(scs[i]->pd_dev);
> +			/* Single domain has been already attached, so reuse dev */
> +			if (ret == -EEXIST) {
> +				scs[i]->pd_dev = dev;
> +			} else {
> +				scs[i]->pd_dev = NULL;
> +				goto pm_detach;
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	data->num_domains = num;
>  	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>  		if (!scs[i])
> @@ -428,6 +468,12 @@ int gdsc_register(struct gdsc_desc *desc,
>  	}
>  
>  	return of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(dev->of_node, data);
> +
> +pm_detach:
> +	for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
> +		if (scs[i]->pd_dev)
> +			dev_pm_domain_detach(scs[i]->pd_dev, false);

I think that if dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() returned -EEXIST you
will attempt to detach the main device's domain here.

> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  void gdsc_unregister(struct gdsc_desc *desc)
> @@ -443,6 +489,8 @@ void gdsc_unregister(struct gdsc_desc *desc)
>  			continue;
>  		if (scs[i]->parent)
>  			pm_genpd_remove_subdomain(scs[i]->parent, &scs[i]->pd);
> +		if (scs[i]->pd_dev && scs[i]->pd_dev != dev)
> +			dev_pm_domain_detach(scs[i]->pd_dev, true);

Ditto

Regards,
Bjorn

>  	}
>  	of_genpd_del_provider(dev->of_node);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h
> index bd537438c793..d58575f8f25f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,11 @@ struct gdsc {
>  
>  	const char 			*supply;
>  	struct regulator		*rsupply;
> +
> +	const char			*domain;
> +	unsigned int			perf_idx;
> +	struct device			*pd_dev;
> +	int				pd_opp;
>  };
>  
>  struct gdsc_desc {
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-23 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-11 13:09 [RFC 0/4] clk: qcom: handle power domains links for GDSC Dmitry Baryshkov
2020-09-11 13:09 ` [RFC 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc: document power domain bindings Dmitry Baryshkov
2020-09-22 22:56   ` Rob Herring
2020-09-11 13:09 ` [RFC 2/4] clk: qcom: gdsc: enable external switchable power domain Dmitry Baryshkov
2020-09-23 14:42   ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2020-09-11 13:09 ` [RFC 3/4] clk: qcom: dispcc-sm8250: handle MMCX " Dmitry Baryshkov
2020-09-11 13:09 ` [RFC 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: pin MMCX to stop the board from crashing Dmitry Baryshkov
2020-10-01  0:23 ` [RFC 0/4] clk: qcom: handle power domains links for GDSC Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200923144212.GB40811@yoga \
    --to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=jonathan@marek.ca \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.