From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84AB7C4346E for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 07:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1CED23741 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 07:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="CNjnpnVV" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F1CED23741 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:40086 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLLpH-0006e6-17 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:37:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLLoE-0005Tk-47 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:36:54 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:28267) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLLoC-0000zJ-CH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:36:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600933011; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=r9GtGVoTQ0/MY6cgdfeB49vf0VeY+yejuyU1vVF4xEs=; b=CNjnpnVVcUh/ebXW4hdSoVQZAp+ciLw6Qh+7hZvLIUYE8bGLwmWWTDv5vMyj+twAVpWDRh tHYmtAFrpgE74NbNn2sLOGpx31fxR6bF30rj1SCbFHofHFA+dtpEzqj16hYFzULm9kp3MR iYDrYug+VLT88pQGtXd6YsmCbGd3g8g= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-326-eLl6CnyyOjOGRw1R27HUtQ-1; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:36:49 -0400 X-MC-Unique: eLl6CnyyOjOGRw1R27HUtQ-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id b20so3232887wmj.1 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:36:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=r9GtGVoTQ0/MY6cgdfeB49vf0VeY+yejuyU1vVF4xEs=; b=cO8E6vlXqTqdPSQw2ZvgIMnXZKApAySUEJ1p6LhsVlbeerhzDtm9HlY8zHFAqfWog6 QiZASnsSobz6T4PIRKgeH0xP2GSBNVL5lnhBrHTwuW7H7+IBSn7mK/atxi76OsWHHgbc 5zBGXP3vvRnFKaL/vexCcuSABK/TDxnLRG2acTKfwvmjz3UFD7Kw7g2cOn+vFUEcHGyl rtDTSERkhkwVPrH7qQkRLlXw5Ly/09DCTyNfly/LgXNAU+AUuC0y8To4afYY8n/6A7g5 rKRP76m/tJ8ifjaXnzRhOjV/+W1mHBv9HzaQNgp3AIT0nLMjcJyOzNzr5RMMIczcz/Sv VHwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533382HtuRnaxY5mzkbxbovKuj/BTVQ2vQTcGWteCfJT+LKq0xMe zPqXFa/qlL8LkWQieOslbYsVgIT0HmRz661KQuqnfiCon64x4g6zTKT2ytOz1ed1/FnEnjz6+hn 7S04Lrw60nwdJQYA= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2905:: with SMTP id p5mr3360205wmp.187.1600933008417; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:36:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJynf7tJE45KY7VafKekmTY/EI1tIhWGNMOBjgl/oT3gij9RQt9e0Kf0Xk+kY864V5UpBb302g== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2905:: with SMTP id p5mr3360184wmp.187.1600933008142; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com (bzq-79-179-71-128.red.bezeqint.net. [79.179.71.128]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o4sm2418668wrv.86.2020.09.24.00.36.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:36:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:36:45 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Julia Suvorova Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/7] hw/pci/pcie: Do not initialize slot capability if acpihp is used Message-ID: <20200924033305-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20200924070013.165026-1-jusual@redhat.com> <20200924070013.165026-4-jusual@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200924070013.165026-4-jusual@redhat.com> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=mst@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=63.128.21.124; envelope-from=mst@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/24 01:10:00 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -32 X-Spam_score: -3.3 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.228, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ani Sinha , Igor Mammedov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 09:00:09AM +0200, Julia Suvorova wrote: > Instead of changing the hot-plug type in _OSC register, do not > initialize the slot capability or set the 'Slot Implemented' flag. > This way guest will choose ACPI hot-plug if it is preferred and leave > the option to use SHPC with pcie-pci-bridge. > > Signed-off-by: Julia Suvorova > --- > hw/i386/acpi-build.h | 2 ++ > hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 2 +- > hw/pci/pcie.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.h b/hw/i386/acpi-build.h > index 487ec7710f..4c5bfb3d0b 100644 > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.h > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.h > @@ -11,4 +11,6 @@ extern const struct AcpiGenericAddress x86_nvdimm_acpi_dsmio; > > void acpi_setup(void); > > +Object *object_resolve_type_unambiguous(const char *typename); > + > #endif > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > index cf503b16af..b7811a8912 100644 > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static void init_common_fadt_data(MachineState *ms, Object *o, > *data = fadt; > } > > -static Object *object_resolve_type_unambiguous(const char *typename) > +Object *object_resolve_type_unambiguous(const char *typename) > { > bool ambig; > Object *o = object_resolve_path_type("", typename, &ambig); > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c > index 5b48bae0f6..c1a082e8b9 100644 > --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c > @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ > #include "hw/pci/pci_bus.h" > #include "hw/pci/pcie_regs.h" > #include "hw/pci/pcie_port.h" > +#include "hw/i386/ich9.h" > +#include "hw/i386/acpi-build.h" > #include "qemu/range.h" > > //#define DEBUG_PCIE Not really happy with pcie.c getting an i386 dependency. > @@ -515,12 +517,26 @@ void pcie_cap_slot_unplug_request_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, > pcie_cap_slot_push_attention_button(hotplug_pdev); > } > > +static bool acpi_pcihp_enabled(void) > +{ > + Object *lpc = object_resolve_type_unambiguous(TYPE_ICH9_LPC_DEVICE); > + > + return lpc && > + object_property_get_bool(lpc, "acpi-pci-hotplug-with-bridge-support", > + NULL); > + > +} > + Why not just check the property unconditionally? > /* pci express slot for pci express root/downstream port > PCI express capability slot registers */ > void pcie_cap_slot_init(PCIDevice *dev, PCIESlot *s) > { > uint32_t pos = dev->exp.exp_cap; > > + if (acpi_pcihp_enabled()) { > + return; > + } > + I think I would rather not teach pcie about acpi. How about we change the polarity, name the property "pci-native-hotplug" or whatever makes sense. > pci_word_test_and_set_mask(dev->config + pos + PCI_EXP_FLAGS, > PCI_EXP_FLAGS_SLOT); > > -- > 2.25.4