From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2039DC4346E for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:26:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC51920809 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OvRw3Crj" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AC51920809 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:54468 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLcUt-0001wA-RW for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 21:26:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60172) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLcTA-00089U-Pu; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 21:24:16 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43660) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLcT7-0006Wk-CV; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 21:24:16 -0400 Received: from C02WT3WMHTD6 (rap-us.hgst.com [199.255.44.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C291207C4; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:24:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600997050; bh=hYYEsTgmRC+XlDKmrT2udxPtV7eFEYI2buiygho9Lqo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OvRw3CrjJIxa0acdikirDjTwU34EeScYhVF9xrs/FW0Ex7SK/GFDbbxhFtwB++bIR hKDJfUkUNaw5rOlZlV2nf/vzym/6r45tnlECq4harpAZ3DVYy/cfpgXdlTa9o67OGO OHWHWw1utJfC0wk6rR8bXecuQKf8GCn517N3VHHs= Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 19:24:07 -0600 From: Keith Busch To: Klaus Jensen Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] hw/block/nvme: zoned namespace command set Message-ID: <20200925012407.GA5897@C02WT3WMHTD6> References: <20200924204516.1881843-1-its@irrelevant.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200924204516.1881843-1-its@irrelevant.dk> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.145.29.99; envelope-from=kbusch@kernel.org; helo=mail.kernel.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/24 21:24:10 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -82 X-Spam_score: -8.3 X-Spam_bar: -------- X-Spam_report: (-8.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.199, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Fam Zheng , Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Klaus Jensen , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:45:00PM +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote: > Finally, I wrote this. I am *NOT* saying that this somehow makes it > better, but as a maintainer, is a big deal to me since both series are > arguably a lot of code to maintain and support (both series are about > the same size). But - I am not the only maintainer, so if Keith (now > suddenly placed in the grim role as some sort of arbiter) signs off on > Dmitry's series, then so be it, I will rest my case. I think it's neat there's enough interest in ZNS that we have multiple solutions to consider. I'm still catching up from virtual conferencing, but I should be able to have a look over the weekend. I know everyone's put a lot of work into the development of this capability, so maybe there's something to be taken from both? Not sure yet if that's feasible, but I'll have a better idea on that later.