All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	ncardwell@google.com, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/4] tcp: consistently check retransmit hint
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:04:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200925170431.1099943-2-ycheng@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200925170431.1099943-1-ycheng@google.com>

tcp_simple_retransmit() used for path MTU discovery may not adjust
the retransmit hint properly by deducting retrans_out before checking
it to adjust the hint. This patch fixes this by a correct routine
tcp_mark_skb_lost() already used by the RACK loss detection.

Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c    | 9 ++-------
 net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 50834e7f958e..f84420dc7d37 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -2675,13 +2675,8 @@ void tcp_simple_retransmit(struct sock *sk)
 
 	skb_rbtree_walk(skb, &sk->tcp_rtx_queue) {
 		if (tcp_skb_seglen(skb) > mss &&
-		    !(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED)) {
-			if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_RETRANS) {
-				TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked &= ~TCPCB_SACKED_RETRANS;
-				tp->retrans_out -= tcp_skb_pcount(skb);
-			}
-			tcp_skb_mark_lost_uncond_verify(tp, skb);
-		}
+		    !(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED))
+			tcp_mark_skb_lost(sk, skb);
 	}
 
 	tcp_clear_retrans_hints_partial(tp);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c
index fdb715bdd2d1..26a42289a870 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c
@@ -246,6 +246,6 @@ void tcp_newreno_mark_lost(struct sock *sk, bool snd_una_advanced)
 			tcp_fragment(sk, TCP_FRAG_IN_RTX_QUEUE, skb,
 				     mss, mss, GFP_ATOMIC);
 
-		tcp_skb_mark_lost_uncond_verify(tp, skb);
+		tcp_mark_skb_lost(sk, skb);
 	}
 }
-- 
2.28.0.681.g6f77f65b4e-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-25 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-25 17:04 [PATCH net-next 0/4] simplify TCP loss marking code Yuchung Cheng
2020-09-25 17:04 ` Yuchung Cheng [this message]
2020-09-25 17:04 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] tcp: move tcp_mark_skb_lost Yuchung Cheng
2020-09-25 17:04 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] tcp: simplify tcp_mark_skb_lost Yuchung Cheng
2020-09-25 17:04 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] tcp: consolidate tcp_mark_skb_lost and tcp_skb_mark_lost Yuchung Cheng
2020-09-26  0:17 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] simplify TCP loss marking code David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200925170431.1099943-2-ycheng@google.com \
    --to=ycheng@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.