From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, TVD_SUBJ_WIPE_DEBT,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC12C4727C for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 23:08:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EFE21531 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 23:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728784AbgI2XIW (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 19:08:22 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:60712 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728192AbgI2XIW (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 19:08:22 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 3645 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 19:08:20 EDT Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 08TM1uZE008150; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:02:01 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 08TM1tBn008147; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:01:55 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:01:55 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Christophe Leroy Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] powerpc: Remove PowerPC 601 Message-ID: <20200929220155.GV28786@gate.crashing.org> References: <27951fa6c9a8f80724d1bc81a6117ac32343a55d.1601359702.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> <00a6948d659e017f8ca63437d1384222c3aede57.1601359702.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00a6948d659e017f8ca63437d1384222c3aede57.1601359702.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 06:09:21AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Powerpc 601 is 25 years old. So is 603, but that one is still used! :-) > It is not selected by any defconfig. > > It requires a lot of special handling as it deviates from the > standard 6xx. > > Retire it. That is fine with me of course. If I get a vote at all for this! Thanks, Segher From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, TVD_SUBJ_WIPE_DEBT,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E79C4727C for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A87132083B for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:06:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A87132083B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1D424R8RzDqTn for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:06:10 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=permerror (SPF Permanent Error: Unknown mechanism found: ip:192.40.192.88/32) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org (client-ip=63.228.1.57; helo=gate.crashing.org; envelope-from=segher@kernel.crashing.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1D211fSFzDqSp for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:04:25 +1000 (AEST) Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 08TM1uZE008150; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:02:01 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 08TM1tBn008147; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:01:55 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:01:55 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Christophe Leroy Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] powerpc: Remove PowerPC 601 Message-ID: <20200929220155.GV28786@gate.crashing.org> References: <27951fa6c9a8f80724d1bc81a6117ac32343a55d.1601359702.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> <00a6948d659e017f8ca63437d1384222c3aede57.1601359702.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00a6948d659e017f8ca63437d1384222c3aede57.1601359702.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 06:09:21AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Powerpc 601 is 25 years old. So is 603, but that one is still used! :-) > It is not selected by any defconfig. > > It requires a lot of special handling as it deviates from the > standard 6xx. > > Retire it. That is fine with me of course. If I get a vote at all for this! Thanks, Segher