All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] spl: Avoid printing boot device if silent console is enabled
@ 2020-09-30  2:14 Otavio Salvador
  2020-09-30  2:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] spl: Add SPL_SERIAL as requirement for SDP_USB_SDP Otavio Salvador
  2020-09-30  5:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] spl: Avoid printing boot device if silent console is enabled Stefan Roese
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Otavio Salvador @ 2020-09-30  2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

This avoid emitting message if silent console is in use, otherwise it
pollutes the output and user desires a quiet console

Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
---

 common/spl/spl.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/common/spl/spl.c b/common/spl/spl.c
index 4840d1d3670..63c48fbf33d 100644
--- a/common/spl/spl.c
+++ b/common/spl/spl.c
@@ -552,7 +552,9 @@ static int boot_from_devices(struct spl_image_info *spl_image,
 		struct spl_image_loader *loader;
 
 		loader = spl_ll_find_loader(spl_boot_list[i]);
-#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_SERIAL_SUPPORT) && defined(CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT)
+#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_SERIAL_SUPPORT) \
+    && defined(CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT)    \
+    && !defined(CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE)
 		if (loader)
 			printf("Trying to boot from %s\n", loader->name);
 		else
-- 
2.28.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] spl: Add SPL_SERIAL as requirement for SDP_USB_SDP
  2020-09-30  2:14 [PATCH 1/2] spl: Avoid printing boot device if silent console is enabled Otavio Salvador
@ 2020-09-30  2:14 ` Otavio Salvador
  2020-10-14 17:43   ` Tom Rini
  2020-09-30  5:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] spl: Avoid printing boot device if silent console is enabled Stefan Roese
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Otavio Salvador @ 2020-09-30  2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

The USB SDP protocol require the SPL serial support to allow the build
to succeed.

Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
---

 common/spl/Kconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/common/spl/Kconfig b/common/spl/Kconfig
index af8255a8d6a..20c5c4af3c3 100644
--- a/common/spl/Kconfig
+++ b/common/spl/Kconfig
@@ -1237,6 +1237,7 @@ endchoice
 
 config SPL_USB_SDP_SUPPORT
 	bool "Support SDP (Serial Download Protocol)"
+	depends on SPL_SERIAL_SUPPORT
 	help
 	  Enable Serial Download Protocol (SDP) device support in SPL. This
 	  allows to download images into memory and execute (jump to) them
-- 
2.28.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] spl: Avoid printing boot device if silent console is enabled
  2020-09-30  2:14 [PATCH 1/2] spl: Avoid printing boot device if silent console is enabled Otavio Salvador
  2020-09-30  2:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] spl: Add SPL_SERIAL as requirement for SDP_USB_SDP Otavio Salvador
@ 2020-09-30  5:23 ` Stefan Roese
  2020-09-30 11:47   ` Otavio Salvador
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2020-09-30  5:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Hi Otavio,

On 30.09.20 04:14, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> This avoid emitting message if silent console is in use, otherwise it
> pollutes the output and user desires a quiet console
> 
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
> ---
> 
>   common/spl/spl.c | 4 +++-
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/common/spl/spl.c b/common/spl/spl.c
> index 4840d1d3670..63c48fbf33d 100644
> --- a/common/spl/spl.c
> +++ b/common/spl/spl.c
> @@ -552,7 +552,9 @@ static int boot_from_devices(struct spl_image_info *spl_image,
>   		struct spl_image_loader *loader;
>   
>   		loader = spl_ll_find_loader(spl_boot_list[i]);
> -#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_SERIAL_SUPPORT) && defined(CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_SERIAL_SUPPORT) \
> +    && defined(CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT)    \
> +    && !defined(CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE)
>   		if (loader)
>   			printf("Trying to boot from %s\n", loader->name);
>   		else
> 

Wouldn't it be better, to add this CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE check to
the console / printf function itself instead of adding it to all
callers?

Thanks,
Stefan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] spl: Avoid printing boot device if silent console is enabled
  2020-09-30  5:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] spl: Avoid printing boot device if silent console is enabled Stefan Roese
@ 2020-09-30 11:47   ` Otavio Salvador
  2020-10-01 12:50     ` Stefan Roese
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Otavio Salvador @ 2020-09-30 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Em qua., 30 de set. de 2020 ?s 02:23, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> escreveu:
> On 30.09.20 04:14, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better, to add this CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE check to
> the console / printf function itself instead of adding it to all
> callers?

I believe in critical errors and like, it is important to print so I'd
say that using a more controlled "hide" mechanism is good.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854          Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] spl: Avoid printing boot device if silent console is enabled
  2020-09-30 11:47   ` Otavio Salvador
@ 2020-10-01 12:50     ` Stefan Roese
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2020-10-01 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On 30.09.20 13:47, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Em qua., 30 de set. de 2020 ?s 02:23, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> escreveu:
>> On 30.09.20 04:14, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be better, to add this CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE check to
>> the console / printf function itself instead of adding it to all
>> callers?
> 
> I believe in critical errors and like, it is important to print so I'd
> say that using a more controlled "hide" mechanism is good.

Agreed. I forgot about that.

Thanks,
Stefan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] spl: Add SPL_SERIAL as requirement for SDP_USB_SDP
  2020-09-30  2:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] spl: Add SPL_SERIAL as requirement for SDP_USB_SDP Otavio Salvador
@ 2020-10-14 17:43   ` Tom Rini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2020-10-14 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 11:14:29PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:

> The USB SDP protocol require the SPL serial support to allow the build
> to succeed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>

Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20201014/95a8456a/attachment.sig>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-14 17:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-30  2:14 [PATCH 1/2] spl: Avoid printing boot device if silent console is enabled Otavio Salvador
2020-09-30  2:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] spl: Add SPL_SERIAL as requirement for SDP_USB_SDP Otavio Salvador
2020-10-14 17:43   ` Tom Rini
2020-09-30  5:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] spl: Avoid printing boot device if silent console is enabled Stefan Roese
2020-09-30 11:47   ` Otavio Salvador
2020-10-01 12:50     ` Stefan Roese

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.