From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3EFC2D0A8 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE362074B for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:44:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1601444652; bh=dCp5BvHqwy9gWRuLy6GX+0629Fd22LBIyYCZMBh7p+M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=p2RokzPHFN49rigJ0HyDpqHySWPvtTbLUZeNgdR2iPcFdwOmw3db5H3oDebi05GBl icd7aKNLylamoN/9vNu/H3NbDyp+yQBXO1tFhwGJX2pHO87I5U4ejkIvVj6g91HLqZ 6cmwUcXqA+256LJ7LYm06FRjbNGivPg9UvwNamqs= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725320AbgI3FoL (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 01:44:11 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38646 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725306AbgI3FoL (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 01:44:11 -0400 Received: from localhost (p54b333e6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.179.51.230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3EE58206DB; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:44:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1601444650; bh=dCp5BvHqwy9gWRuLy6GX+0629Fd22LBIyYCZMBh7p+M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OW1qYNN7fV+OMc3HO/X0DFy4Qnw7CgQGK+HyklkYURDFtHLUrQ4ACyy+HKqQ6hofw 5r5cn0TqDY1aKasmv21+67YG697aRFsNsnQdbhvtKzf1S3upego6QqX7eqnHq5Mw04 Z/MqHojJD35ucXYk/EPMeG10oqeafKeCQiT4GMQ0= Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 07:44:07 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Khalil Blaiech Cc: Rob Herring , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , Khalil Blaiech , Vadim Pasternak Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] dt-bindings: i2c: I2C binding for Mellanox BlueField SoC Message-ID: <20200930054407.GB1305@ninjato> References: <20200927135710.GD7298@kunai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Our driver supports both ACPI and devicetree. However, the platform > firmware running on our platform implements ACPI and doesn't > really rely on devicetree. Do you think we should keep the devicetree > support? Or should I get rid of it before we apply the patch? Usually, I'd say, if it is not used, remove it. If it would be used in the near future, then we could keep it. But that you know better than I do :) --CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAl90GycACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYv6w//btWEklK8FQRb+CS0GuoXmW1L/T2or3Ci5IVV1rBhCDBkBuSr5tuLGrL7 Shj9YBKANogOteRCJUFEJ8j101/UAIcJE2J9hMnXerI5AhCdv+b+Z7WS3t9/hs5f ZvxCrtT6PfITZzksf5tdLY8BoIB9bJGgOUG9W9gJVj/F/Esy9022mHB3kz6/lcJo FElqcBzEwE4o57aTl1vp9lxHGSZ8abtYjWhcw9UGzdq2NGjvzW/YmH8wAi0Mdo+r tzaIEK6KqeaGr0jDFhzEYCzXQDQqLXgYdS0EmznZ9DdCxXJH09vtjZ6ctgzauc94 4/PjfsOXJsnODaZb6wotoNbKicPcj3Vxa4sksrysMywL/yZ2EEbZWAxDO4Cs1x0P UGDF5krlFlFQyQ041I5A9Imng8SEElfutBYMitxdwdj+/yf01GOQqZULNF3QfsVn 7L/VK8KfxZOiszqJ8FpGM5xizN5TYwN5syCfGTQ1gxzfRNK4qGxjA8pDkR0djxq8 E72Y3jUnge0GaD+IhF7Rs10y8J9c0z+/XgxfKi69RuSUDbYXw1iTjdOsuu142wgq 80H/k2WeeglrGa2cMVdAjz0aZJ0OqK6MT5CJRr7B2ULW9Ak3iPpEhmH6bL8XRQaB GSMhgCHZ9fTv+mmlIhgHvwS3lD8mkfWWXCAeffjGcu5ckrqZhb0= =KZ4S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5--