All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>
To: brendanhiggins@google.com, tytso@mit.edu,
	adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC v2 2/2] fs: ext4: Modify inode-test.c to use KUnit parameterized testing
Date: Thu,  1 Oct 2020 08:51:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201001032136.27121-1-98.arpi@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200930144052.62720-1-98.arpi@gmail.com>

Modifies fs/ext4/inode-test.c to use the parameterized testing
feature of KUnit.

Signed-off-by: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>
---
 fs/ext4/inode-test.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
index d62d802c9c12..f127f9123cc1 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@
 #define UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_EXTRA_BITS_1_CASE\
 	"2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on"
 
+#define NUMBER_OF_TESTCASES 16
+
 struct timestamp_expectation {
 	const char *test_case_name;
 	struct timespec64 expected;
@@ -101,7 +103,40 @@ static time64_t get_32bit_time(const struct timestamp_expectation * const test)
  */
 static void inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding(struct kunit *test)
 {
-	const struct timestamp_expectation test_data[] = {
+	struct timespec64 timestamp;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < NUMBER_OF_TESTCASES; ++i) {
+		struct timestamp_expectation *test_case = (struct timestamp_expectation *)get_test_case_parameters(test);
+
+		timestamp.tv_sec = get_32bit_time(test_case);
+		ext4_decode_extra_time(&timestamp,
+				       cpu_to_le32(test_case->extra_bits));
+
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
+				    test_case->expected.tv_sec,
+				    timestamp.tv_sec,
+				    CASE_NAME_FORMAT,
+				    test_case->test_case_name,
+				    test_case->msb_set,
+				    test_case->lower_bound,
+				    test_case->extra_bits);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
+				    test_case->expected.tv_nsec,
+				    timestamp.tv_nsec,
+				    CASE_NAME_FORMAT,
+				    test_case->test_case_name,
+				    test_case->msb_set,
+				    test_case->lower_bound,
+				    test_case->extra_bits);
+	}
+}
+
+struct timestamp_expectation *get_test_parameters(void)
+{
+	struct timestamp_expectation *test_data = (struct timestamp_expectation *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct timestamp_expectation) * NUMBER_OF_TESTCASES, GFP_KERNEL);
+
+	const struct timestamp_expectation test_data_init[] = {
 		{
 			.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
 			.msb_set = true,
@@ -232,35 +267,13 @@ static void inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding(struct kunit *test)
 		}
 	};
 
-	struct timespec64 timestamp;
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); ++i) {
-		timestamp.tv_sec = get_32bit_time(&test_data[i]);
-		ext4_decode_extra_time(&timestamp,
-				       cpu_to_le32(test_data[i].extra_bits));
+	memcpy(test_data, test_data_init, sizeof(struct timestamp_expectation) * ARRAY_SIZE(test_data_init));
 
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
-				    test_data[i].expected.tv_sec,
-				    timestamp.tv_sec,
-				    CASE_NAME_FORMAT,
-				    test_data[i].test_case_name,
-				    test_data[i].msb_set,
-				    test_data[i].lower_bound,
-				    test_data[i].extra_bits);
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
-				    test_data[i].expected.tv_nsec,
-				    timestamp.tv_nsec,
-				    CASE_NAME_FORMAT,
-				    test_data[i].test_case_name,
-				    test_data[i].msb_set,
-				    test_data[i].lower_bound,
-				    test_data[i].extra_bits);
-	}
+	return test_data;
 }
 
 static struct kunit_case ext4_inode_test_cases[] = {
-	KUNIT_CASE(inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding, get_test_parameters, NUMBER_OF_TESTCASES, sizeof(struct timestamp_expectation)),
 	{}
 };
 
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

      reply	other threads:[~2020-10-01  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-30 14:40 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC v2 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing Arpitha Raghunandan
2020-10-01  3:21 ` Arpitha Raghunandan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201001032136.27121-1-98.arpi@gmail.com \
    --to=98.arpi@gmail.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.