From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3628C4727F for ; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 19:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF46206DB for ; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 19:31:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1601753505; bh=Wvykz0d5ZYec37xUGQzpQhBRrvtjxqe2FN+VuUwT6Uo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=LKZPsproAvtaq2d8qhbudMzQo3VB2ijbI64FHK5Xzk8W9UuGl42PBD/JUEGAIY58i 77hM7H9og3fRBM8q5qdLGA/Ma38lF3JWYCnUlD8aMNms0w0WDCHl0ShnVU2XNVoEvb e3SQJGmRyscUjMdtfWGgU0uSRwXmXYVlI6Y2PMuw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725857AbgJCTbo (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2020 15:31:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39834 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725818AbgJCTbn (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Oct 2020 15:31:43 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x844.google.com (mail-qt1-x844.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::844]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A23AC0613E7 for ; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 12:31:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x844.google.com with SMTP id y11so5830471qtn.9 for ; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 12:31:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CWQLnefJnV9lai9ha07+j4R+wHuwUmFBxVnJsYEYjsI=; b=TRIuiKupRuCU5VUlLtlKbsBlNQbnfv9jVMRmvy5WrUMTyv5g7SdRa3REDAkElPyBzv WSOws0iapEwPs/zPE6it9FcrVqCtAnsz/UakcRiEJxUOMFcBe7pAZ20U41kh3yUYUB6u lAK2edDDWs/OyXo320TXSOEjMz+2dy680rqXQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to; bh=CWQLnefJnV9lai9ha07+j4R+wHuwUmFBxVnJsYEYjsI=; b=gkREsC7zrz87+ShPIDwq+QEFRu96a3q8Buze2D5ivf7w2v4VQ+Bznl0N0iCF2WW7/T niejQLZH9ef/sbI8ik2FuEUCk8pQPZEiRMOO9uZItaPWXGqVHM88Gcqf//A52G1jsvmI 8PZ1qAi53MbG5zRsFUAyuX5itb0Y2JKqqDtSiHMKvEzqq9RIO3R5LxPB6ogd3/peiGmv +9z6oZ0iqNiM0NQCY4YZCBxL7UeJ1FD2b/MVykY/8Eg8u549CzzDzAGqGGWapbaxNNcD mJPIqqTelHIB/Y5LYBoIeiHaaNp/MvtHNdalw/X9D1ctJ45Y1Kmas9fhBBtivozMboVT 7IdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5332WW64/CKg1C5ardeIwMH3pif4JFDgtpJLv2TBUwS7wUwnGL+A jaY0qYZrD085+rkn9IrhZOua7Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXj0to29E/962sKEc6U/odEp+QvXfYgP1BYnP1Sa/tA6o1DsKTTnJkOmEDBav7C7kIlGgFyQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4548:: with SMTP id z8mr7894174qtn.291.1601753502454; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 12:31:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chatter.i7.local ([89.36.78.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a66sm3745298qkc.52.2020.10.03.12.31.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Oct 2020 12:31:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 15:31:37 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Julia Lawall Cc: Joe Perches , Mark Brown , tools@linux.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jerome Brunet , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, David Lechner , Valdis =?utf-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, Martin Blumenstingl , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Neil Armstrong Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons rather than commas to separate statements Message-ID: <20201003193137.z2bpwzlz5a66kkex@chatter.i7.local> Mail-Followup-To: Julia Lawall , Joe Perches , Mark Brown , tools@linux.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jerome Brunet , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, David Lechner , Valdis =?utf-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, Martin Blumenstingl , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Neil Armstrong References: <1601233948-11629-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> <160132172369.55460.9237357219623604216.b4-ty@kernel.org> <20200929113745.GB4799@sirena.org.uk> <20201001110150.GA6715@sirena.org.uk> <20201003191501.o56tqq63d2buq5ox@chatter.i7.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 09:18:51PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > There seems to be some mismatch between b4's use of the > > > cover letter to a patch series and what maintainers that > > > apply a subset of the patches in the patch series. > > > > > > The merge description shows the entire patch series as > > > applied, but the actual merge is only a subset of the > > > series. > > > > > > Can this be improved in b4? > > > > So, the following logic should be applied: > > > > - if the entire series was applied, reply to 0/n > > - if a subset only is applied, reply to each n/n of the patch that was > > cherry-picked out of the series > > > > Is that an accurate summary? > > That sounds good. I'm worried that this can get unwieldy for series of 50 patches where 49 got applied. Would the following be better: ----- From: ... To: ... Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons... On Sun... > These patches... > > [...] A subset of these patches was applied to https://... Thanks! [5/18] regmap: debugfs: commit: (etc) ----- In other words, we: - specifically say that it's a subset - instead of just enumerating the number of patches that were applied, as is currently the case ([1/1]) we list the exact numbers out of the posted series (e.g. [5/18]) I think this is a better solution than potentially flooding everyone with 49 emails. -K From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:31:37 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons rather than commas to separate statements Message-Id: <20201003193137.z2bpwzlz5a66kkex@chatter.i7.local> List-Id: References: <1601233948-11629-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> <160132172369.55460.9237357219623604216.b4-ty@kernel.org> <20200929113745.GB4799@sirena.org.uk> <20201001110150.GA6715@sirena.org.uk> <20201003191501.o56tqq63d2buq5ox@chatter.i7.local> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Julia Lawall Cc: Joe Perches , Mark Brown , tools@linux.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jerome Brunet , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, David Lechner , Valdis =?utf-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, Martin Blumenstingl , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Neil Armstrong On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 09:18:51PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > There seems to be some mismatch between b4's use of the > > > cover letter to a patch series and what maintainers that > > > apply a subset of the patches in the patch series. > > > > > > The merge description shows the entire patch series as > > > applied, but the actual merge is only a subset of the > > > series. > > > > > > Can this be improved in b4? > > > > So, the following logic should be applied: > > > > - if the entire series was applied, reply to 0/n > > - if a subset only is applied, reply to each n/n of the patch that was > > cherry-picked out of the series > > > > Is that an accurate summary? > > That sounds good. I'm worried that this can get unwieldy for series of 50 patches where 49 got applied. Would the following be better: ----- From: ... To: ... Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons... On Sun... > These patches... > > [...] A subset of these patches was applied to https://... Thanks! [5/18] regmap: debugfs: commit: (etc) ----- In other words, we: - specifically say that it's a subset - instead of just enumerating the number of patches that were applied, as is currently the case ([1/1]) we list the exact numbers out of the posted series (e.g. [5/18]) I think this is a better solution than potentially flooding everyone with 49 emails. -K From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2616C4363C for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2020 04:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FE42206DB for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2020 04:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="HG3boKZ+"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="TRIuiKup" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7FE42206DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=NLlS7jOfgTL1zst5Ui++NZa/1b7UgLlA+GDJ/ypWekk=; b=HG3boKZ+CgPbtOKpm4LB9C+FE DIm+/N/FxpyzHQ9rh1mD9LAe5PI8fpc3K49FCFeX+zjHJtJ272RvLnODhowlID+TA6k5GLGVC/Ufc GOpgYTm/SVtRWR1ZX6g8QTN+/H+WBb+vsElT/+DVdnCZaz+mQJhjQddjykG3n7dCbXmEvu0OO3Npt hCiyYg7Zv4R7bepFiyInGg3G6/p7zjVciAcj1vik3nN6LUYHmXqzq8vA4fBnC4XsKEG4E/sHjjvOb 9lxNQ8IpGxhWvFSWyZxtYK37SCdjNAU8NGZMOq8xs41oeSj1y2kgrf55/7uOrIaQdgkOn910LmZXc QJbRXqUaA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kOvMF-0006K2-54; Sun, 04 Oct 2020 04:10:47 +0000 Received: from mail-qk1-x743.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::743]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kOvMB-0006HN-Aa for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2020 04:10:44 +0000 Received: by mail-qk1-x743.google.com with SMTP id 16so7931600qkf.4 for ; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 21:10:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CWQLnefJnV9lai9ha07+j4R+wHuwUmFBxVnJsYEYjsI=; b=TRIuiKupRuCU5VUlLtlKbsBlNQbnfv9jVMRmvy5WrUMTyv5g7SdRa3REDAkElPyBzv WSOws0iapEwPs/zPE6it9FcrVqCtAnsz/UakcRiEJxUOMFcBe7pAZ20U41kh3yUYUB6u lAK2edDDWs/OyXo320TXSOEjMz+2dy680rqXQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to; bh=CWQLnefJnV9lai9ha07+j4R+wHuwUmFBxVnJsYEYjsI=; b=NPeNX3ibY6FOFau2EG3sn3VL1lSIHczWs0ySnvYZ0iorCGYYCZaX+LAD1O5WbNWok2 lyVeTtLItb46SmF8l7j1HOki6t4+mtQtk3hVzgAfaSFaJz6XasL73Jv8czn3sDlO1J51 dfVQyk7bOMCi+3O3RhepoJUZtMKhhP2c00aXYIAF+Umd+N69yvP/3N4Alodzd3QdJWSZ wUhtgcK74lgTCMoPPnSp7JTPhmJvFBIeF44mObpNz7H6jVGp4DYPUghaDJ5ei2fW4rdC 6y9TywhhVjTwmQzJlRZWgvSXLCQUBYGDL4boduNbsK4Sa8HyrTze3yY6slo0L+FtXJhl Fggg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315FQ6KOUkbKsjcaNGZpJKQOIe7Kl+8ZUVITJBC7RZ4QWMI5cMA dn0TNOCahDCLNYwMi3hg1KA2z4XyszJuZeL0DO4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXj0to29E/962sKEc6U/odEp+QvXfYgP1BYnP1Sa/tA6o1DsKTTnJkOmEDBav7C7kIlGgFyQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4548:: with SMTP id z8mr7894174qtn.291.1601753502454; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 12:31:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chatter.i7.local ([89.36.78.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a66sm3745298qkc.52.2020.10.03.12.31.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Oct 2020 12:31:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 15:31:37 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Julia Lawall Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons rather than commas to separate statements Message-ID: <20201003193137.z2bpwzlz5a66kkex@chatter.i7.local> Mail-Followup-To: Julia Lawall , Joe Perches , Mark Brown , tools@linux.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jerome Brunet , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, David Lechner , Valdis =?utf-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, Martin Blumenstingl , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Neil Armstrong References: <1601233948-11629-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> <160132172369.55460.9237357219623604216.b4-ty@kernel.org> <20200929113745.GB4799@sirena.org.uk> <20201001110150.GA6715@sirena.org.uk> <20201003191501.o56tqq63d2buq5ox@chatter.i7.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201004_001043_530219_B2214980 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.90 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, Neil Armstrong , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Jerome Brunet , David Lechner , Martin Blumenstingl , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Valdis =?utf-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Joe Perches , openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, tools@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 09:18:51PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > There seems to be some mismatch between b4's use of the > > > cover letter to a patch series and what maintainers that > > > apply a subset of the patches in the patch series. > > > > > > The merge description shows the entire patch series as > > > applied, but the actual merge is only a subset of the > > > series. > > > > > > Can this be improved in b4? > > > > So, the following logic should be applied: > > > > - if the entire series was applied, reply to 0/n > > - if a subset only is applied, reply to each n/n of the patch that was > > cherry-picked out of the series > > > > Is that an accurate summary? > > That sounds good. I'm worried that this can get unwieldy for series of 50 patches where 49 got applied. Would the following be better: ----- From: ... To: ... Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons... On Sun... > These patches... > > [...] A subset of these patches was applied to https://... Thanks! [5/18] regmap: debugfs: commit: (etc) ----- In other words, we: - specifically say that it's a subset - instead of just enumerating the number of patches that were applied, as is currently the case ([1/1]) we list the exact numbers out of the posted series (e.g. [5/18]) I think this is a better solution than potentially flooding everyone with 49 emails. -K _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E92C4363C for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2020 05:25:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C07B2068E for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2020 05:25:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Wn+/IJ8W"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="TRIuiKup" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7C07B2068E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-amlogic-bounces+linux-amlogic=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=BBYxGyxMTJZLuKKATj8vLj6B235AcRbN5xp/I1ZQHYE=; b=Wn+/IJ8Wn6gFvExDo79QqFu4u 9CCKFNhAaAhIbSUjza/I84+TYhYUeisQcLZgZXVKqTAMMLR2cejojDIaze9s8ZATApRWseiovAjyo p9451mmB2qWn4UaX6eDWu9vg7pDgYa32hKoTc0ex5HT9P8bx+e8Gh69VkM3kOQNaFbmeWPGNoPet8 /noFoT9UvQqM/FDVJfVm+BS6EZpDgblNfwPlsECmmT2IogAvuPOlzVQCLwdcjGYO3bv6+4Ad0IiiA DDrjd3JB42fvoj/GbIzSpLVD5St411hJFDgaueXP3BmeWHVUZYwUWMwrpyrGVrcy8Er0jtx0qUvtZ sLQ7WZMnQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kOwWC-0001ZJ-I5; Sun, 04 Oct 2020 05:25:08 +0000 Received: from mail-qk1-x744.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::744]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kOwWA-0001Yz-3L for linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2020 05:25:07 +0000 Received: by mail-qk1-x744.google.com with SMTP id w12so8025895qki.6 for ; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 22:25:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CWQLnefJnV9lai9ha07+j4R+wHuwUmFBxVnJsYEYjsI=; b=TRIuiKupRuCU5VUlLtlKbsBlNQbnfv9jVMRmvy5WrUMTyv5g7SdRa3REDAkElPyBzv WSOws0iapEwPs/zPE6it9FcrVqCtAnsz/UakcRiEJxUOMFcBe7pAZ20U41kh3yUYUB6u lAK2edDDWs/OyXo320TXSOEjMz+2dy680rqXQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to; bh=CWQLnefJnV9lai9ha07+j4R+wHuwUmFBxVnJsYEYjsI=; b=X4oEGCIZ6Lyl40iYfsphcMT3OnCgr69yGLgZt4QjnsLKV94GPjLnzy6Lpy/q6VPdox tDt+c7PaeeBR/Hro6bp8CLcRsZwGzSVlpLGjinYrIsr8ohM5a33Kf+mmDWdUoTG4R4oJ pip5s++Llx+AkY2QvuBjTuQk72iTLGVW+tGVQduzXtND+vSx3gz9ecms5HjEx94YxbA3 KCdebU0pkD14F7zo32U3p6Kd7CZAeWv709STah2tUOyBvS9GnBfcEsGBicC5ReAg3vRF nBWizDCh6xnwLhs0k36w30da7fqntleGN3wJN1RxVjIkDlIN8Q4iOdR6gc5kbWzyvdc5 TFLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ISSqQGua3xFxILtM2+OsfmYucCWHrYK/bH/91s6kRzN/o5BtC UkTYqtJoI3qh2OV1UcMczKJFXGYaFJKTSaZ6Nys= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXj0to29E/962sKEc6U/odEp+QvXfYgP1BYnP1Sa/tA6o1DsKTTnJkOmEDBav7C7kIlGgFyQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4548:: with SMTP id z8mr7894174qtn.291.1601753502454; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 12:31:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chatter.i7.local ([89.36.78.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a66sm3745298qkc.52.2020.10.03.12.31.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Oct 2020 12:31:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 15:31:37 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Julia Lawall Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons rather than commas to separate statements Message-ID: <20201003193137.z2bpwzlz5a66kkex@chatter.i7.local> Mail-Followup-To: Julia Lawall , Joe Perches , Mark Brown , tools@linux.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jerome Brunet , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, David Lechner , Valdis =?utf-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, Martin Blumenstingl , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Neil Armstrong References: <1601233948-11629-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> <160132172369.55460.9237357219623604216.b4-ty@kernel.org> <20200929113745.GB4799@sirena.org.uk> <20201001110150.GA6715@sirena.org.uk> <20201003191501.o56tqq63d2buq5ox@chatter.i7.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201004_012506_297495_67F827F7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.42 ) X-BeenThere: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, Neil Armstrong , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Jerome Brunet , David Lechner , Martin Blumenstingl , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Valdis =?utf-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Joe Perches , openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, tools@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-amlogic" Errors-To: linux-amlogic-bounces+linux-amlogic=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 09:18:51PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > There seems to be some mismatch between b4's use of the > > > cover letter to a patch series and what maintainers that > > > apply a subset of the patches in the patch series. > > > > > > The merge description shows the entire patch series as > > > applied, but the actual merge is only a subset of the > > > series. > > > > > > Can this be improved in b4? > > > > So, the following logic should be applied: > > > > - if the entire series was applied, reply to 0/n > > - if a subset only is applied, reply to each n/n of the patch that was > > cherry-picked out of the series > > > > Is that an accurate summary? > > That sounds good. I'm worried that this can get unwieldy for series of 50 patches where 49 got applied. Would the following be better: ----- From: ... To: ... Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons... On Sun... > These patches... > > [...] A subset of these patches was applied to https://... Thanks! [5/18] regmap: debugfs: commit: (etc) ----- In other words, we: - specifically say that it's a subset - instead of just enumerating the number of patches that were applied, as is currently the case ([1/1]) we list the exact numbers out of the posted series (e.g. [5/18]) I think this is a better solution than potentially flooding everyone with 49 emails. -K _______________________________________________ linux-amlogic mailing list linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic