From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0769C4363A for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4396522249 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:09:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603213759; bh=9okKdgs6yArjf4mMDWyzMJE+o/l8srWvdz0xqyEZXDM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:List-ID:From; b=19YnIFLQW+QO2lln1AwObXq1di0BvjYc8ejb1nMUV5IpSDQXAh9AyK34sqltakN2g HObc63bmjlfGg7LiafxjsOFFBdVau1jpqr36kcdvRMLuG38eIDuFvnG+lJnnfPf48/ cfsSrN50khu3RSKhTo+bYoNYMZWef0k1/+T25/Cc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2395154AbgJTRJS (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:09:18 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47458 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2395149AbgJTRJS (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:09:18 -0400 Received: from dellmb.labs.office.nic.cz (nat-1.nic.cz [217.31.205.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6DE82177B; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:09:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603213757; bh=9okKdgs6yArjf4mMDWyzMJE+o/l8srWvdz0xqyEZXDM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=YAPZcXyRNuKo5/htm7wVkuHtE/Z2QvRAmqDhwd/CE72dDZaTf/TXoS4RWFEhJJzUQ gtzm825v938NSfMZ/7yWqcseywLe3z5H/Zt9yZZNmWVEXycetSaeenkWSDLatNANiY eOuVa9Q0rdT+VklnkXlcHU6R06mjWllapJ/Xd+4g= From: =?UTF-8?q?Marek=20Beh=C3=BAn?= To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , =?UTF-8?q?Marek=20Beh=C3=BAn?= Subject: [PATCH russell-kings-net-queue 0/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fill phylink's supported interfaces to make SFP modules work under DSA ports Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:09:10 +0200 Message-Id: <20201020170912.25959-1-kabel@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hi Russell, this series applies on your net-queue branch. It adds a new DSA switch operation which is used to determine a DSA switch port's supported PHY interface modes to fill in phylink's config supported_interfaces member to make SFP modules work under DSA ports. This operation is then implemented for mv88e6xxx. I was thinking whether this method should be renamed to something like serdes_supported_interfaces or what, so that it is clear that we are not interested in RGMII and other non-SERDES modes... BTW: You once complained that you don't like that this needs again to add a new op to DSA switch and for mv88e6xxx driver to add a new op for the each chip... So maybe phylink_validate code can be refactored to do this? My opinion is that it is cleaner if we just add another op, but I am open to other opinions. Marek Marek Behún (2): net: dsa: fill phylink's config supported_interfaces member net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement .phylink_get_interfaces operation drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.h | 2 ++ include/net/dsa.h | 2 ++ net/dsa/slave.c | 4 +++ 4 files changed, 65 insertions(+) base-commit: a32e90737c1c92653767d3c95c63c16b9b72c6c2 prerequisite-patch-id: 74af250a98f8d7d48da6b7655000995dd9d9310b prerequisite-patch-id: 1ab9d0fedae2be621a821aac01ebf680627279d3 prerequisite-patch-id: 24af4837bacf2f8c9afcedd497a7d61c7cb7cdf1 -- 2.26.2