From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EBEC4363A for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD4C20E65 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:29:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603466964; bh=S5Kn3O68f3PPLfkqkvktfe3VeUC3zGbtEVTjNDfQ1dI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=gwSQmOz4wRe2NIIZT8hjNJYvHyMLwy9YvpAzcs8vD4Dj5yHyjoGoCs0elucODcP/1 prTKVBLE96iYs/6UZ0DDWT0IonJXgIUdHEfu80Wm+2wXWyaMD54dA3kocUASSCkEnP SXgJj+HcIFL+pQ5D9kydrF/okXd9lki3ZNgtwqNw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S465827AbgJWP3X (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:29:23 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53246 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S465813AbgJWP3X (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:29:23 -0400 Received: from kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (unknown [163.114.132.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 801ED21D47; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:29:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603466962; bh=S5Kn3O68f3PPLfkqkvktfe3VeUC3zGbtEVTjNDfQ1dI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=k2SO/YRozuovEuKIf8sn6zUN/XwdtHaF9gL3hkJKPAE6Cs643zu+niAbpUS4R4MtE ECSBECy/GVl/FeWRYrh2+Ce0w0QPLyOF+eEzKzhkkpFk24bKCBubpTQ56pPrt2l1gy 7So0ful2VpPJKGQZVYEeMaKyIsl2cYqkIWzORdN4= Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 08:29:20 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: David Laight Cc: Kees Cook , Francis Laniel , "linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 3/3] Rename nla_strlcpy to nla_strscpy. Message-ID: <20201023082920.6addf3cb@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20201020164707.30402-1-laniel_francis@privacyrequired.com> <20201020164707.30402-4-laniel_francis@privacyrequired.com> <202010211649.ABD53841B@keescook> <2286512.66XcFyAlgq@machine> <202010221302.5BA047AC9@keescook> <20201022160551.33d85912@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 08:07:44 +0000 David Laight wrote: > FWIW I suspect the 'return -ERR on overflow' is going to bite us. > Code that does p += strsxxx(p, ..., lim - p, ...) assuming (or not > caring) about overflow goes badly wrong. I don't really care either way, but in netlink there's usually an attribute per value, nothing combines strings like p += strx..(). Looking at the conversion in patch 2 the callers just want to check for overflow.