From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77629C388F9 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1356021D43 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:47:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603450031; bh=G2EaU4mWljkQC6TVUEJFwltCjR3+RIJPSAcW6gMXBoc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=UkmPXU/+BjQuli3lWgzOWSz8Z+s6C7V6Z/aycgP6NKZsceFSsELMGKgCp+m+hDj81 49oY65rUsZM+8580tecEC829wTDSoh1IjQf35XmRPnZrhGnv8k65gaQQm+fnHZFih+ koBbP/63mZflpsIjgSY1l1AVxpQbHhYR0IcA6Bnc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S462487AbgJWKrK (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 06:47:10 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53138 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S370826AbgJWKrJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 06:47:09 -0400 Received: from devnote2 (NE2965lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [210.141.244.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2693F20FC3; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:47:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603450028; bh=G2EaU4mWljkQC6TVUEJFwltCjR3+RIJPSAcW6gMXBoc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OAEIp75kVS0ePYn8KtHw99JSRG9TYI1CdIZtu8KMZZx4A3W+TsriI78qTUnac5m2I YqfQHle/hWUR6H9cuq1fjW6xQGSO9AfKpQiEnhpOIVqOmldHOr+OIgvHK3DQUV3nBY NzrXPZQ8+vUNscB2QVijn0lCuilG8piEOGHDQLXI= Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 19:47:04 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Andy Lutomirski , x86-ml , Joerg Roedel , lkml Subject: Re: [RFC] Have insn decoder functions return success/failure Message-Id: <20201023194704.f723c86e5f8dfc1133dd5930@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20201023093254.GC23324@zn.tnic> References: <20201020143746.GG11583@zn.tnic> <20201021095013.d82637f84af564ae4363189d@kernel.org> <20201021092750.GA4050@zn.tnic> <20201021232613.e40c1daef4b567e0e29044a4@kernel.org> <20201021164558.GB4050@zn.tnic> <20201022163100.1139b28220da4eafb5e70fcc@kernel.org> <20201022093044.GA29222@zn.tnic> <20201022222140.f46e6db1243e05fdd049b504@kernel.org> <20201023182850.c54ac863159fb312c411c029@kernel.org> <20201023093254.GC23324@zn.tnic> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:32:54 +0200 Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 06:28:50PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > OK, would you think we also better to integrate it with insn_init()? > > That kinda makes sense because it would obviate the need to call it > as user of the interface but simply do insn_decode() which will do > everything for you. Lemme see how it works out in practice... > > > Borislav, would you handle it? I think you already started. > > Sure, I'll have a poke at it. Thanks! I look forward to it. -- Masami Hiramatsu