From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6E4C2D0A3 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 22:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38789206CA for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 22:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="JkPPek9K" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 38789206CA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:60910 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYGBO-0001Vj-40 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:14:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYG0x-0003Kc-Fu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:03:28 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:28104) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kYG0u-0006ZN-LG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:03:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1604008999; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+SZZYhSE2rpTgLRMeYs39Kq9SIu/LUpzeiN/rszhjA4=; b=JkPPek9KUkj1Fuaw2FhXvkYD0UnZW2CrHvQo2C+PBjjjv6nAbUywBrYMMRRUviFovpcXZw t+Rq2W1akxrSUmD6d/rjFxI31XnjlyQYcX6Zn/RlR96tjPkDQPfsYhfxgJPHy1ligIQMIx ArH/cHYEbvRLXowIEToDBznp/TPAF+0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-419-yWraVOmoPVyzDAoNkDCSKQ-1; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:03:18 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yWraVOmoPVyzDAoNkDCSKQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E260D1018F78 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 22:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-114-68.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.114.68]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEDD5C1C4; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 22:03:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Eduardo Habkost To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH 11/36] qdev: Make check_prop_still_unset() get Object* argument Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:02:21 -0400 Message-Id: <20201029220246.472693-12-ehabkost@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20201029220246.472693-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> References: <20201029220246.472693-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=ehabkost@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=ehabkost@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/29 00:47:54 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" , John Snow , Markus Armbruster , Igor Mammedov , Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Make the code more generic and not specific to TYPE_DEVICE. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- Cc: Paolo Bonzini Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" Cc: Eduardo Habkost Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org --- hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c b/hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c index af1339e562..85dd38db0f 100644 --- a/hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c +++ b/hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c @@ -32,11 +32,11 @@ #include "hw/pci/pci.h" #include "util/block-helpers.h" -static bool check_prop_still_unset(DeviceState *dev, const char *name, +static bool check_prop_still_unset(Object *obj, const char *name, const void *old_val, const char *new_val, Error **errp) { - const GlobalProperty *prop = qdev_find_global_prop(OBJECT(dev), name); + const GlobalProperty *prop = qdev_find_global_prop(obj, name); if (!old_val) { return true; @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static void set_drive_helper(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name, * TODO Should this really be an error? If no, the old value * needs to be released before we store the new one. */ - if (!check_prop_still_unset(dev, name, *ptr, str, errp)) { + if (!check_prop_still_unset(obj, name, *ptr, str, errp)) { return; } @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static void set_chr(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name, void *opaque, * TODO Should this really be an error? If no, the old value * needs to be released before we store the new one. */ - if (!check_prop_still_unset(dev, name, be->chr, str, errp)) { + if (!check_prop_still_unset(obj, name, be->chr, str, errp)) { return; } @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void set_netdev(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name, * TODO Should this really be an error? If no, the old value * needs to be released before we store the new one. */ - if (!check_prop_still_unset(dev, name, ncs[i], str, errp)) { + if (!check_prop_still_unset(obj, name, ncs[i], str, errp)) { goto out; } -- 2.28.0