All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paweł Jasiak" <pawel@jasiak.xyz>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: fanotify_mark EFAULT on x86
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 18:16:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201102171643.GA5870@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201102122638.GB23988@quack2.suse.cz>

On 02/11/20, Jan Kara wrote:
> Strange. Thanks for report. Looks like some issue got created / exposed
> somewhere between 5.5 and 5.9 (actually probably between 5.5 and 5.7
> because the Linaro report you mentioned [1] is from 5.7-rc6). There were
> no changes in this area in fanotify, I think it must have been some x86
> change that triggered this. Hum, looking into x86 changelog in that time
> range there was a series rewriting 32-bit ABI [2] that got merged into
> 5.7-rc1. Can you perhaps check whether 5.6 is good and 5.7-rc1 is bad?

5.6 works.
5.7-rc1 doesn't work.

-- 

Paweł Jasiak

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-02 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-01 21:27 PROBLEM: fanotify_mark EFAULT on x86 Paweł Jasiak
2020-11-01 21:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-01 22:27   ` Paweł Jasiak
2020-11-02 12:26 ` Jan Kara
2020-11-02 17:16   ` Paweł Jasiak [this message]
2020-11-03 21:17   ` Paweł Jasiak
2020-11-04 10:14     ` Jan Kara
2020-11-23 16:46     ` Jan Kara
2020-11-23 22:46       ` Paweł Jasiak
2020-11-24  8:45         ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:20           ` Jan Kara
2020-11-24 10:28             ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-26 10:48               ` Jan Kara
2020-11-26 10:52                 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-25 19:31             ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-11-26 10:48               ` Jan Kara
2020-11-23 23:07       ` [PATCH] fanotify: Fix fanotify_mark() on 32-bit archs kernel test robot
2020-11-23 23:07         ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201102171643.GA5870@gmail.com \
    --to=pawel@jasiak.xyz \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.