All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org, elver@google.com,
	andreyknvl@google.com, glider@google.com, dvyukov@google.com,
	cai@lca.pw
Subject: Re: [PATCH kcsan 3/3] kcsan: Fix encoding masks and regain address bit
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:23:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201106012335.GA3025@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201105220324.15808-3-paulmck@kernel.org>

Hi Marco,

On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 02:03:24PM -0800, paulmck@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> 
> The watchpoint encoding masks for size and address were off-by-one bit
> each, with the size mask using 1 unnecessary bit and the address mask
> missing 1 bit. However, due to the way the size is shifted into the
> encoded watchpoint, we were effectively wasting and never using the
> extra bit.
> 
> For example, on x86 with PAGE_SIZE==4K, we have 1 bit for the is-write
> bit, 14 bits for the size bits, and then 49 bits left for the address.
> Prior to this fix we would end up with this usage:
> 
> 	[ write<1> | size<14> | wasted<1> | address<48> ]
> 
> Fix it by subtracting 1 bit from the GENMASK() end and start ranges of
> size and address respectively. The added static_assert()s verify that
> the masks are as expected. With the fixed version, we get the expected
> usage:
> 
> 	[ write<1> | size<14> |             address<49> ]
> 
> Functionally no change is expected, since that extra address bit is
> insignificant for enabled architectures.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/kcsan/encoding.h | 14 ++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/encoding.h b/kernel/kcsan/encoding.h
> index 4f73db6..b50bda9 100644
> --- a/kernel/kcsan/encoding.h
> +++ b/kernel/kcsan/encoding.h
> @@ -37,14 +37,12 @@
>   */
>  #define WATCHPOINT_ADDR_BITS (BITS_PER_LONG-1 - WATCHPOINT_SIZE_BITS)
>  
> -/*
> - * Masks to set/retrieve the encoded data.
> - */
> -#define WATCHPOINT_WRITE_MASK BIT(BITS_PER_LONG-1)
> -#define WATCHPOINT_SIZE_MASK                                                   \
> -	GENMASK(BITS_PER_LONG-2, BITS_PER_LONG-2 - WATCHPOINT_SIZE_BITS)
> -#define WATCHPOINT_ADDR_MASK                                                   \
> -	GENMASK(BITS_PER_LONG-3 - WATCHPOINT_SIZE_BITS, 0)
> +/* Bitmasks for the encoded watchpoint access information. */
> +#define WATCHPOINT_WRITE_MASK	BIT(BITS_PER_LONG-1)
> +#define WATCHPOINT_SIZE_MASK	GENMASK(BITS_PER_LONG-2, BITS_PER_LONG-1 - WATCHPOINT_SIZE_BITS)
> +#define WATCHPOINT_ADDR_MASK	GENMASK(BITS_PER_LONG-2 - WATCHPOINT_SIZE_BITS, 0)
> +static_assert(WATCHPOINT_ADDR_MASK == (1UL << WATCHPOINT_ADDR_BITS) - 1);

Nit:

Since you use the static_assert(), why not define WATCHPOINT_ADDR_MASK
as:

#define WATCHPOINT_ADDR_MASK (BIT(WATCHPOINT_SIZE_BITS) - 1)

Besides, WATCHPOINT_SIZE_MASK can also be defined as:

#define WATCHPOINT_SIZE_MASK GENMASK(BITS_PER_LONG - 2, WATCHPOINT_SIZE_BITS)

Regards,
Boqun

> +static_assert((WATCHPOINT_WRITE_MASK ^ WATCHPOINT_SIZE_MASK ^ WATCHPOINT_ADDR_MASK) == ~0UL);
>  
>  static inline bool check_encodable(unsigned long addr, size_t size)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.9.5
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-06  1:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-05 22:03 [PATCH kcsan 0/3] KCSAN updates for 5.11 Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-05 22:03 ` [PATCH kcsan 1/3] kcsan: selftest: Ensure that address is at least PAGE_SIZE paulmck
2020-11-05 22:03 ` [PATCH kcsan 2/3] kcsan: Never set up watchpoints on NULL pointers paulmck
2020-11-05 22:03 ` [PATCH kcsan 3/3] kcsan: Fix encoding masks and regain address bit paulmck
2020-11-06  1:23   ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2020-11-06  9:03     ` Marco Elver
2020-11-06 10:18       ` Boqun Feng
2020-11-06 10:47         ` Marco Elver
2020-11-06  9:34   ` [PATCH v2] " Marco Elver
2020-11-06 10:19     ` Boqun Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201106012335.GA3025@boqun-archlinux \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.