From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28928C56201 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92CF2224C for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728398AbgKLORr (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:17:47 -0500 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:48118 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727035AbgKLORq (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:17:46 -0500 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 932F780AE; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:17:41 +0200 From: Tony Lindgren To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Roger Quadros , Keerthy , Jyri Sarha , Tomi Valkeinen , Peter Ujfalusi , Lokesh Vutla , Rob Herring , Tero Kristo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65*: Cleanup disabled nodes at SoC dtsi level Message-ID: <20201112141741.GQ26857@atomide.com> References: <20201112014929.25227-1-nm@ti.com> <20201112014929.25227-2-nm@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201112014929.25227-2-nm@ti.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Nishanth Menon [201112 01:49]: > While there are pros and cons on each of these approaches, the right > thing to do will be to stick with device tree default standards and > work within those established rules. So, we choose to go with option > (a). > > Lets cleanup defaults of am654 SoC dtsi before this gets more harder > to cleanup later on and new SoCs are added. > > The dtb generated is identical with the patch and it is just cleanup to > ensure we have a clean usage model Thanks this looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FAFEC2D0A3 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A75EB216FD for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="owDCzpGR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A75EB216FD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=atomide.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Qm004ZyeNUw9epujuSH9V87xQ3Yi8QICZROA2uygNLI=; b=owDCzpGRVCcpbvJwxW3en32lo JWEfmQEORk3Acv75ZZrvzwP83C2FYnVW9ufcEpf1DJPNhmpTCoeNisya9P2vPQsbZzTn9wi820S2k bgiQvL7HxFvLiqtHH62ZKsG3ygacdztdcrCIwVke51dNGRL1u49QnvXxD2fBF8yVFfbOUo12cqFin SAqAOtBiIO46zbgcFSBi8mnVvG72cBMSNuoFLQtl/L1HNy04Ssl52daRcCJV3TR2ICOMmctrXEKk4 LOzQr2CVqr983Y4me5MOaUDeqX8P08ZmbzsMLeNgjYap/MKO2+UVkXSDDhqr8s9pGlhsxJ985C2jI +J8s+rMCA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kdDQ8-0001V1-3z; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:17:52 +0000 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kdDQ6-0001TT-EI for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:17:51 +0000 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 932F780AE; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:17:41 +0200 From: Tony Lindgren To: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65*: Cleanup disabled nodes at SoC dtsi level Message-ID: <20201112141741.GQ26857@atomide.com> References: <20201112014929.25227-1-nm@ti.com> <20201112014929.25227-2-nm@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201112014929.25227-2-nm@ti.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201112_091750_547809_983A8A57 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.53 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tero Kristo , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Lokesh Vutla , Keerthy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jyri Sarha , Peter Ujfalusi , Rob Herring , Tomi Valkeinen , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Roger Quadros Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org * Nishanth Menon [201112 01:49]: > While there are pros and cons on each of these approaches, the right > thing to do will be to stick with device tree default standards and > work within those established rules. So, we choose to go with option > (a). > > Lets cleanup defaults of am654 SoC dtsi before this gets more harder > to cleanup later on and new SoCs are added. > > The dtb generated is identical with the patch and it is just cleanup to > ensure we have a clean usage model Thanks this looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel