On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 08:36:44AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 10:11 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König > > --- > > Hello, > > > > this can also be squashed into the respective patches instead. > > > > Best regards > > Uwe > > > >  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 5 +++++ > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > [] > > @@ -615,6 +615,11 @@ our %deprecated_apis = ( > >   "rcu_barrier_sched" => "rcu_barrier", > >   "get_state_synchronize_sched" => "get_state_synchronize_rcu", > >   "cond_synchronize_sched" => "cond_synchronize_rcu", > > + "devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource" => "devm_platform_get_request_and_ioremap_resource", > > Do we really need 46 character length function names? I can drop the "_and" and maybe "_get", so we're down to 38 "only". Other than that I think all name parts are relevant. > > + "devm_platform_ioremap_resource" => "devm_platform_request_ioremap_resource", > > + "devm_platform_ioremap_resource_wc" => "devm_platform_request_ioremap_resource_wc", > > + "devm_ioremap_resource" => "devm_request_ioremap_resource", > > + "devm_ioremap_resource_wc" => "devm_request_ioremap_resource_wc", > >  ); > >   > > > >  #Create a search pattern for all these strings to speed up a loop below > > And do please send your proposed patches to the appropriate maintainers. Yes, sure. This patch 3/2 was only a quick shot and it was already clear to me that I have to redo it. I want to squash this change in the patch that does the actual renaming, I assume that's fine for you?! Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |