From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB6BC56202 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 20:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0112224F for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 20:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="jqKaZkxW" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726296AbgKMU4A (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:56:00 -0500 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:59104 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726092AbgKMU4A (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:56:00 -0500 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0ADKtsSE103497; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:55:54 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1605300954; bh=kGw9m7CHBC2tezcxzoqeRHbsp27X46LPmzeqoXrCqPk=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=jqKaZkxWimstzwdrpxp+NmfkZdbeh+owRhnz/dxifNRB7gXRdUmkQYq0XuvJTdbJR ky6YjcJwOFpgH9EvkN7w8DB9dpA1/1stP+o3UaPhI9bbKVGB4GMihNemi24nB5Zt2Q MTpa2Qk7HUHepyUv6YHrjEDDYrCu77Zget21F+gs= Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (dlee108.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.38]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0ADKtsAX084224 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:55:54 -0600 Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:55:54 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:55:54 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0ADKtrDf051402; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:55:53 -0600 Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:55:52 -0600 From: Nishanth Menon To: Sekhar Nori CC: Lokesh Vutla , Faiz Abbas , , , , , , Grygorii Strashko Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-main: Add gpio nodes in main domain Message-ID: <20201113205552.p63u2gxgw4pfxil5@stunning> References: <20201102191120.20380-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com> <20201102191120.20380-2-faiz_abbas@ti.com> <20201112163953.soia5cje4ry42ujf@kahuna> <6ce6de4b-6e4d-1d2d-aa7a-570d1796d668@ti.com> <20201113184020.drntugqsnj7dzsnh@ultimatum> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 00:39-20201114, Sekhar Nori wrote: > > I was using the latest schema from master. But I changed to 2020.08.1 > also, and still don't see the warning. > > $ dt-doc-validate --version > 2020.12.dev1+gab5a73fcef26 > > I dont have a system-wide dtc installed. One in kernel tree is updated. > > $ scripts/dtc/dtc --version > Version: DTC 1.6.0-gcbca977e > > Looking at your logs, it looks like you have more patches than just this > applied. I wonder if thats making a difference. Can you check with just > these patches applied to linux-next or share your tree which includes > other patches? > > In your logs, you have such error for other interrupt controller nodes > as well. For example: > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi: > /bus@100000/bus@30000000/interrupt-controller1: Missing #address-cells > in interrupt provider > > Which I don't see in my logs. My guess is some other patch(es) in your > patch stack either uncovers this warning or causes it. Oh boy! I sent you and myself on wild goose chase! Really sorry about messing up in the report of bug. It is not dtbs_check, it is building dtbs with W=2 that generates this warning. dtc 1.6.0 is sufficient to reproduce this behavior. Using v5.10-rc1 as baseline (happens the same with next-20201113 as well. v5.10-rc1: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/Pn9HDqRjQ4/ (recording: https://asciinema.org/a/55YVpql9Bq8rh8fePTxI2xObO) v5.10-rc1 + 1st patch in the series(since we are testing): https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/QWQRMSv565/ (recording: https://asciinema.org/a/ZSKZkOY13l4lmZ2xWH34jMlM1) Diff: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/239sYYT2QY/ -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86338C55ABD for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 20:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0616C2224A for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 20:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="d4YNcn2m"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="jqKaZkxW" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0616C2224A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=I5fW5UMOgSUK3zrgpNSfIBtvQAeXDx7+m0bqYXpoCB8=; b=d4YNcn2miEqUiuDMrhBnqsFzW tq1ruNPOmP521Rjm0BrSm++wcFoB75MKdDm7MRzXaLQbcIlc0xfAkPmZG1hMPN5uXLzy0lAXze2Qx SDC+CsXTykQoUCyEzkI326YYrf4gsWIvhBMVeRjcQMlkL7i/IDaDZiykSpINkue/ufZnQhHrZbEfA q81N1D/ryjWMGZFaidM+wbVdjK8FZFeZd7WM4MCvH+z5pkX2mzzrDKR+NeTyrPNl/ykHayg6vl+xH MMqKF8hTLAe/r8iW0CbabJmIPgkuu1B30UEEguSLdjMBSGCbVt83sUzCFbOY1O0Gv/JRTuIhlLtie uCqM6ClpA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kdg6z-0007Np-62; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 20:56:01 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kdg6v-0007NO-5m for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 20:55:59 +0000 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0ADKtsSE103497; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:55:54 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1605300954; bh=kGw9m7CHBC2tezcxzoqeRHbsp27X46LPmzeqoXrCqPk=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=jqKaZkxWimstzwdrpxp+NmfkZdbeh+owRhnz/dxifNRB7gXRdUmkQYq0XuvJTdbJR ky6YjcJwOFpgH9EvkN7w8DB9dpA1/1stP+o3UaPhI9bbKVGB4GMihNemi24nB5Zt2Q MTpa2Qk7HUHepyUv6YHrjEDDYrCu77Zget21F+gs= Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (dlee108.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.38]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0ADKtsAX084224 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:55:54 -0600 Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:55:54 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:55:54 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0ADKtrDf051402; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:55:53 -0600 Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:55:52 -0600 From: Nishanth Menon To: Sekhar Nori Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-main: Add gpio nodes in main domain Message-ID: <20201113205552.p63u2gxgw4pfxil5@stunning> References: <20201102191120.20380-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com> <20201102191120.20380-2-faiz_abbas@ti.com> <20201112163953.soia5cje4ry42ujf@kahuna> <6ce6de4b-6e4d-1d2d-aa7a-570d1796d668@ti.com> <20201113184020.drntugqsnj7dzsnh@ultimatum> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201113_155558_173148_3E8450A8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.78 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Grygorii Strashko , Lokesh Vutla , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, t-kristo@ti.com, Faiz Abbas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 00:39-20201114, Sekhar Nori wrote: > > I was using the latest schema from master. But I changed to 2020.08.1 > also, and still don't see the warning. > > $ dt-doc-validate --version > 2020.12.dev1+gab5a73fcef26 > > I dont have a system-wide dtc installed. One in kernel tree is updated. > > $ scripts/dtc/dtc --version > Version: DTC 1.6.0-gcbca977e > > Looking at your logs, it looks like you have more patches than just this > applied. I wonder if thats making a difference. Can you check with just > these patches applied to linux-next or share your tree which includes > other patches? > > In your logs, you have such error for other interrupt controller nodes > as well. For example: > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi: > /bus@100000/bus@30000000/interrupt-controller1: Missing #address-cells > in interrupt provider > > Which I don't see in my logs. My guess is some other patch(es) in your > patch stack either uncovers this warning or causes it. Oh boy! I sent you and myself on wild goose chase! Really sorry about messing up in the report of bug. It is not dtbs_check, it is building dtbs with W=2 that generates this warning. dtc 1.6.0 is sufficient to reproduce this behavior. Using v5.10-rc1 as baseline (happens the same with next-20201113 as well. v5.10-rc1: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/Pn9HDqRjQ4/ (recording: https://asciinema.org/a/55YVpql9Bq8rh8fePTxI2xObO) v5.10-rc1 + 1st patch in the series(since we are testing): https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/QWQRMSv565/ (recording: https://asciinema.org/a/ZSKZkOY13l4lmZ2xWH34jMlM1) Diff: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/239sYYT2QY/ -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel