Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/21] Introduce Alderlake-S

From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/21] Introduce Alderlake-S
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:53:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201118075340.did5zvrwa5qhbp6u@ldmartin-desk1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201117185029.22078-1-aditya.swarup@intel.com>

+Rodrigo, +Joonas

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:50:08AM -0800, Aditya Swarup wrote:
>v2 of the patch series to introduce ADL-S.
>
>v1 for the series is posted at:
>https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/82917/
>
>This series is rebased after hotplug refactors and review
>comments addressed from v1.
>
>Please ignore the DG1 patch as it is cherry-picked to fix
>conflicts.
>
>Aditya Swarup (8):
>  drm/i915/dg1: Enable ports
>  drm/i915/tgl: Fix macros for TGL SOC based WA
>  drm/i915/adl_s: Configure DPLL for ADL-S
>  drm/i915/adl_s: Configure Port clock registers for ADL-S
>  drm/i915/adl_s: Add HTI support and initialize display for ADL-S
>  drm/i915/adl_s: Add adl-s ddc pin mapping
>  drm/i915/adl_s: Add vbt port and aux channel settings for adls
>  drm/i915/adl_s: Add display, gt, ctx and ADL-S
>
>Anusha Srivatsa (4):
>  drm/i915/adl_s: Add PCH support
>  drm/i915/adl_s: Add Interrupt Support
>  drm/i915/adl_s: Add PHYs for Alderlake S
>  drm/i915/adl_s: Load DMC
>
>Caz Yokoyama (3):
>  drm/i915/adl_s: Add ADL-S platform info and PCI ids
>  x86/gpu: add ADL_S stolen memory support
>  drm/i915/adl_s: MCHBAR memory info registers are moved
>
>José Roberto de Souza (1):
>  drm/i915/display: Add HAS_D12_PLANE_MINIMIZATION
>
>Lucas De Marchi (1):
>  drm/i915/adl_s: Add power wells
>
>Matt Roper (3):
>  drm/i915/adl_s: Update combo PHY master/slave relationships
>  drm/i915/adl_s: Update PHY_MISC programming
>  drm/i915/adl_s: Re-use TGL GuC/HuC firmware
>
>Tejas Upadhyay (1):
>  drm/i915/adl_s: Update memory bandwidth parameters
>
> arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c                |   1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c     |  70 +++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c       |   8 ++
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_combo_phy.c    |  23 +++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_csr.c      |  10 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c      |  64 ++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  |  37 +++++-
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c    |  11 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c |  38 +++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c     |  20 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c      |   4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c   |   8 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h |   4 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c   | 119 ++++++++++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c      |   4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h               |  47 ++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c               |   5 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c               |  13 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h               |  54 +++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c      |   9 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h      |   1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c             |  18 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c              |   8 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.h              |   3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c               |   2 +-
> include/drm/i915_pciids.h                     |  13 ++

besides the changes to uC and workarounds, all the rest would go
through dinq. Should we bother creating a topic branch for adl-s?

Lucas De Marchi

> 26 files changed, 464 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
>
>-- 
>2.27.0
>
>_______________________________________________
>Intel-gfx mailing list
>Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx