From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E399C63777 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:58:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B847224248 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727040AbgKRI6I (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:58:08 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:34517 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726775AbgKRI6I (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:58:08 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id E406367357; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:58:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:58:04 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jan Beulich Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Tejun Heo , Josef Bacik , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Coly Li , Mike Snitzer , dm-devel@redhat.com, Richard Weinberger , Jan Kara , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Jens Axboe Subject: Re: merge struct block_device and struct hd_struct Message-ID: <20201118085804.GA20384@lst.de> References: <20201118084800.2339180-1-hch@lst.de> <22ca5396-0253-f286-9eab-d417b2e0b3ad@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <22ca5396-0253-f286-9eab-d417b2e0b3ad@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 09:56:11AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > since this isn't the first series from you recently spamming > xen-devel, may I ask that you don't Cc entire series to lists > which are involved with perhaps just one out of the many patches? > IMO Cc lists should be compiled on a per-patch basis; the cover > letter may of course be sent to the union of all of them. No way. Individual CCs are completely broken as they don't provide the reviewer a context. If you don't want xen-blkfront patches to go to xen-devel remove it from MAINTAINERS. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3515EC5519F for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A41C221E9 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="uDmmwnQ6" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9A41C221E9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=MShqP6EZaz9kjz5UwaOajwuSXul81U3DuP5h/pY5K0c=; b=uDmmwnQ6LWCF64wuIvFOBxfj+ j8xAqRNKv+/PhGPrlykR+jzHS1mZndkc1Fw+uFFk6blZs0K6PwMQ7/XvSmb8klyjlAdDdImsh/lU+ tHi4znvAp/8fVZFNrdqHd6ZBBlw+pQMahqhjaTOX0KMM2GCVb8f+tVDL51ximRRkSJ+SfxQCFkjCS dHCNlb61OJS457FVO2er4E7W/EVKLvPHM3btJH/FWdbCEa/LVet/377dExYjqSUUVfDyeUE/WEGMU mNC0jqY/A1sYqtE91ZE98nKJUdm2bX1nxRpe3tNp1RSTFJsB+m+m38N5jkMxo7SHyN5VTDpiXhPm7 gLq5zH8oQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kfJIL-00058e-4o; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:58:29 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kfJI5-0004zL-UG for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:58:17 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id E406367357; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:58:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:58:04 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jan Beulich Subject: Re: merge struct block_device and struct hd_struct Message-ID: <20201118085804.GA20384@lst.de> References: <20201118084800.2339180-1-hch@lst.de> <22ca5396-0253-f286-9eab-d417b2e0b3ad@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <22ca5396-0253-f286-9eab-d417b2e0b3ad@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201118_035814_195622_C3FCD0B1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.06 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Mike Snitzer , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Richard Weinberger , Josef Bacik , Coly Li , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Jan Kara , Tejun Heo , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Christoph Hellwig Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 09:56:11AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > since this isn't the first series from you recently spamming > xen-devel, may I ask that you don't Cc entire series to lists > which are involved with perhaps just one out of the many patches? > IMO Cc lists should be compiled on a per-patch basis; the cover > letter may of course be sent to the union of all of them. No way. Individual CCs are completely broken as they don't provide the reviewer a context. If you don't want xen-blkfront patches to go to xen-devel remove it from MAINTAINERS. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03CDC5519F for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B467C221E9 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:59:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B467C221E9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-223-R49WakTDPpezCnFz-_8V3w-1; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:59:33 -0500 X-MC-Unique: R49WakTDPpezCnFz-_8V3w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C4D410B9CA3; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22AE55D9CA; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE50C181A71F; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 0AI8wEVM020147 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:58:14 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id E38C12166BA0; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast05.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEDB82166B44 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC42190E42D for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-567-QVcOjZtGPzagHB4OWcVZ2Q-1; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 03:58:08 -0500 X-MC-Unique: QVcOjZtGPzagHB4OWcVZ2Q-1 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id E406367357; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:58:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:58:04 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jan Beulich Message-ID: <20201118085804.GA20384@lst.de> References: <20201118084800.2339180-1-hch@lst.de> <22ca5396-0253-f286-9eab-d417b2e0b3ad@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <22ca5396-0253-f286-9eab-d417b2e0b3ad@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.6 X-loop: dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Mike Snitzer , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Richard Weinberger , Josef Bacik , Coly Li , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Jan Kara , Tejun Heo , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [dm-devel] merge struct block_device and struct hd_struct X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 09:56:11AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > since this isn't the first series from you recently spamming > xen-devel, may I ask that you don't Cc entire series to lists > which are involved with perhaps just one out of the many patches? > IMO Cc lists should be compiled on a per-patch basis; the cover > letter may of course be sent to the union of all of them. No way. Individual CCs are completely broken as they don't provide the reviewer a context. If you don't want xen-blkfront patches to go to xen-devel remove it from MAINTAINERS. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel