From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEC0C63798 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B37C208FE for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726692AbgKRSVm (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:21:42 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:39032 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726360AbgKRSVm (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:21:42 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 0AIICTPb015618; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:12:29 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 0AIICQYo015615; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:12:26 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:12:26 -0600 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Nick Desaulniers , Peter Zijlstra , Sami Tolvanen , Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-kernel , Matt Mullins , Ingo Molnar , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Dmitry Vyukov , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Andrii Nakryiko , John Fastabend , KP Singh , netdev , bpf , Kees Cook , Josh Poimboeuf , linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: violating function pointer signature Message-ID: <20201118181226.GK2672@gate.crashing.org> References: <20201116175107.02db396d@gandalf.local.home> <47463878.48157.1605640510560.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20201117142145.43194f1a@gandalf.local.home> <375636043.48251.1605642440621.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20201117153451.3015c5c9@gandalf.local.home> <20201118132136.GJ3121378@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20201118121730.12ee645b@gandalf.local.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201118121730.12ee645b@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:17:30PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > I could change the stub from (void) to () if that would be better. Don't? In a function definition they mean exactly the same thing (and the kernel uses (void) everywhere else, which many people find clearer). In a function declaration that is not part of a definition it means no information about the arguments is specified, a quite different thing. This is an obsolescent feature, too. Many many years from now it could perhaps mean the same as (void), just like in C++, but not yet. Segher