From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4CBC2D0E4 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 398F62078E for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:13:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 398F62078E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:48846 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kh6yn-000328-9j for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 03:13:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35718) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kh6o6-0005me-Oc; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 03:02:42 -0500 Received: from poy.remlab.net ([2001:41d0:2:5a1a::]:54630 helo=ns207790.ip-94-23-215.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kh6o4-0004f6-Sr; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 03:02:42 -0500 Received: from basile.remlab.net (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ns207790.ip-94-23-215.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FA860412; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 09:02:38 +0100 (CET) From: remi.denis.courmont@huawei.com To: qemu-arm@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH 07/17] target/arm: add 64-bit S-EL2 to EL exception table Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:02:27 +0200 Message-Id: <20201123080237.18465-7-remi.denis.courmont@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <3333301.iIbC2pHGDl@basile.remlab.net> References: <3333301.iIbC2pHGDl@basile.remlab.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:41d0:2:5a1a::; envelope-from=remi@remlab.net; helo=ns207790.ip-94-23-215.eu X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" From: Rémi Denis-Courmont With the ARMv8.4-SEL2 extension, EL2 is a legal exception level in secure mode, though it can only be AArch64. This patch adds the target EL for exceptions from 64-bit S-EL2. It also fixes the target EL to EL2 when HCR.{A,F,I}MO are set in secure mode. Those values were never used in practice as the effective value of HCR was always 0 in secure mode. Signed-off-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont --- target/arm/helper.c | 10 +++++----- target/arm/op_helper.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c index e55059585b..a69fde826b 100644 --- a/target/arm/helper.c +++ b/target/arm/helper.c @@ -9005,13 +9005,13 @@ static const int8_t target_el_table[2][2][2][2][2][4] = { {{/* 0 1 1 0 */{ 3, 3, 3, -1 },{ 3, -1, -1, 3 },}, {/* 0 1 1 1 */{ 3, 3, 3, -1 },{ 3, -1, -1, 3 },},},},}, {{{{/* 1 0 0 0 */{ 1, 1, 2, -1 },{ 1, 1, -1, 1 },}, - {/* 1 0 0 1 */{ 2, 2, 2, -1 },{ 1, 1, -1, 1 },},}, - {{/* 1 0 1 0 */{ 1, 1, 1, -1 },{ 1, 1, -1, 1 },}, - {/* 1 0 1 1 */{ 2, 2, 2, -1 },{ 1, 1, -1, 1 },},},}, + {/* 1 0 0 1 */{ 2, 2, 2, -1 },{ 2, 2, -1, 1 },},}, + {{/* 1 0 1 0 */{ 1, 1, 1, -1 },{ 1, 1, 1, 1 },}, + {/* 1 0 1 1 */{ 2, 2, 2, -1 },{ 2, 2, 2, 1 },},},}, {{{/* 1 1 0 0 */{ 3, 3, 3, -1 },{ 3, 3, -1, 3 },}, {/* 1 1 0 1 */{ 3, 3, 3, -1 },{ 3, 3, -1, 3 },},}, - {{/* 1 1 1 0 */{ 3, 3, 3, -1 },{ 3, 3, -1, 3 },}, - {/* 1 1 1 1 */{ 3, 3, 3, -1 },{ 3, 3, -1, 3 },},},},}, + {{/* 1 1 1 0 */{ 3, 3, 3, -1 },{ 3, 3, 3, 3 },}, + {/* 1 1 1 1 */{ 3, 3, 3, -1 },{ 3, 3, 3, 3 },},},},}, }; /* diff --git a/target/arm/op_helper.c b/target/arm/op_helper.c index ff91fe6121..5e0f123043 100644 --- a/target/arm/op_helper.c +++ b/target/arm/op_helper.c @@ -652,10 +652,10 @@ void HELPER(access_check_cp_reg)(CPUARMState *env, void *rip, uint32_t syndrome, target_el = exception_target_el(env); break; case CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL2: - /* Requesting a trap to EL2 when we're in EL3 or S-EL0/1 is + /* Requesting a trap to EL2 when we're in EL3 is * a bug in the access function. */ - assert(!arm_is_secure(env) && arm_current_el(env) != 3); + assert(arm_current_el(env) != 3); target_el = 2; break; case CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL3: -- 2.29.2