All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/12] btrfs: lift rw mount setup from mount and remount
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 17:50:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201123165040.GF8669@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac259f3ceafae5a8bb9b6c554375588705aa55b2.1605736355.git.boris@bur.io>

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:06:16PM -0800, Boris Burkov wrote:
> Mounting rw and remounting from ro to rw naturally share invariants and
> functionality which result in a correctly setup rw filesystem. Luckily,
> there is even a strong unity in the code which implements them. In
> mount's open_ctree, these operations mostly happen after an early return
> for ro file systems, and in remount, they happen in a section devoted to
> remounting ro->rw, after some remount specific validation passes.
> 
> However, there are unfortunately a few differences. There are small
> deviations in the order of some of the operations, remount does not
> cleanup orphan inodes in root_tree or fs_tree, remount does not create
> the free space tree, and remount does not handle "one-shot" mount
> options like clear_cache and uuid tree rescan.
> 
> Since we want to add building the free space tree to remount, and since
> it is possible to leak orphans on a filesystem mounted as ro then
> remounted rw

The statement is not specific if the orphans are files or roots. But I
don't agree that a leak is possible, or need a proof of the claim above.

The mount-time orphan cleanup will start early, but otherwise orphan
cleanup is checked and started on dentry lookups (btrfs_lookup_dentry).
Deleted but not clened tree roorts are all found and removed, regardless
of rw or ro->rw mount.

So I wonder if you claim there's a leak just by lack of an explicit call
on the remount path.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-23 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-18 23:06 [PATCH v7 00/10] btrfs: free space tree mounting fixes Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] btrfs: lift rw mount setup from mount and remount Boris Burkov
2020-11-23 16:50   ` David Sterba [this message]
2020-11-30 23:31     ` Boris Burkov
2020-12-15 18:01       ` David Sterba
2020-11-23 16:57   ` David Sterba
2020-12-01  0:01     ` Boris Burkov
2020-12-15 17:50       ` David Sterba
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] btrfs: cleanup all orphan inodes on ro->rw remount Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] btrfs: only mark bg->needs_free_space if free space tree is on Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] btrfs: create free space tree on ro->rw remount Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] btrfs: clear oneshot options on mount and remount Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] btrfs: clear free space tree on ro->rw remount Boris Burkov
2020-11-30 19:49   ` David Sterba
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] btrfs: keep sb cache_generation consistent with space_cache Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] btrfs: use sb state to print space_cache mount option Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] btrfs: warn when remount will not change the free space tree Boris Burkov
2020-11-30 20:05   ` David Sterba
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] btrfs: remove free space items when disabling space cache v1 Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] btrfs: skip space_cache v1 setup when not using it Boris Burkov
2020-11-18 23:06 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] btrfs: fix lockdep error creating free space tree Boris Burkov
2020-11-20 21:32 ` [PATCH v7 00/10] btrfs: free space tree mounting fixes David Sterba
2020-11-30 18:24   ` Boris Burkov
2020-11-30 20:29     ` David Sterba
2020-11-30 20:33 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201123165040.GF8669@twin.jikos.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=boris@bur.io \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.