All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/gt: Simplify virtual engine handling for execlists_hold()
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:42:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201124114219.29020-16-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201124114219.29020-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Now that the tasklet completely controls scheduling of the requests, and
we postpone scheduling out the old requests, we can keep a hanging
virtual request bound to the engine on which it hung, and remove it from
te queue. On release, it will be returned to the same engine and remain
in its queue until it is scheduled; after which point it will become
eligible for transfer to a sibling. Instead, we could opt to resubmit the
request along the virtual engine on unhold, making it eligible for load
balancing immediately -- but that seems like a pointless optimisation
for a hanging context.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 29 -----------------------------
 1 file changed, 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 9e9a87e86c5f..fd2c18da71a9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -2852,35 +2852,6 @@ static bool execlists_hold(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 		goto unlock;
 	}
 
-	if (rq->engine != engine) { /* preempted virtual engine */
-		struct virtual_engine *ve = to_virtual_engine(rq->engine);
-
-		/*
-		 * intel_context_inflight() is only protected by virtue
-		 * of process_csb() being called only by the tasklet (or
-		 * directly from inside reset while the tasklet is suspended).
-		 * Assert that neither of those are allowed to run while we
-		 * poke at the request queues.
-		 */
-		GEM_BUG_ON(!reset_in_progress(&engine->execlists));
-
-		/*
-		 * An unsubmitted request along a virtual engine will
-		 * remain on the active (this) engine until we are able
-		 * to process the context switch away (and so mark the
-		 * context as no longer in flight). That cannot have happened
-		 * yet, otherwise we would not be hanging!
-		 */
-		spin_lock(&ve->base.active.lock);
-		GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_inflight(rq->context) != engine);
-		GEM_BUG_ON(ve->request != rq);
-		ve->request = NULL;
-		spin_unlock(&ve->base.active.lock);
-		i915_request_put(rq);
-
-		rq->engine = engine;
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * Transfer this request onto the hold queue to prevent it
 	 * being resumbitted to HW (and potentially completed) before we have
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-24 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-24 11:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/gem: Drop free_work for GEM contexts Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/gt: Track the overall awake/busy time Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/gt: Protect context lifetime with RCU Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/gt: Split the breadcrumb spinlock between global and contexts Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/gt: Move the breadcrumb to the signaler if completed upon cancel Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 16:19   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-24 16:30     ` Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 17:02       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-25 19:56   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2020-11-26 11:32     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/gt: Decouple completed requests on unwind Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 17:13   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-24 17:31     ` Chris Wilson
2020-11-25  9:15       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-25 10:21         ` Chris Wilson
2020-11-25 16:21           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/gt: Check for a completed last request once Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 17:19   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-24 17:38     ` Chris Wilson
2020-11-25  8:59       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/gt: Replace direct submit with direct call to tasklet Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/gt: ce->inflight updates are now serialised Chris Wilson
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/gt: Use virtual_engine during execlists_dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/gt: Decouple inflight virtual engines Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/gt: Defer schedule_out until after the next dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/gt: Remove virtual breadcrumb before transfer Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/gt: Shrink the critical section for irq signaling Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/gt: Resubmit the virtual engine on schedule-out Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2020-11-24 14:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/16] drm/i915/gem: Drop free_work for GEM contexts Patchwork
2020-11-24 14:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-11-24 14:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-11-24 18:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-11-25 21:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/16] drm/i915/gem: Drop free_work for GEM contexts (rev2) Patchwork
2020-11-25 21:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-11-25 21:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-11-25 23:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201124114219.29020-16-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.