From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C50C2D0E4 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A30C72222C for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=citrix.com header.i=@citrix.com header.b="MpIn6mHo" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A30C72222C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=nongnu.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:59402 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kieg8-0004jn-Rz for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:24:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiefZ-0004KN-4U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:24:17 -0500 Received: from esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com ([216.71.145.155]:36119) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiefX-0003fa-2G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:24:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1606487055; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=D5L4R48jTaqMmWokScSU3RSjvbXkKn0bwvjerOZsofs=; b=MpIn6mHoMt9usjEE/5CN9cOY2wg4MwdQu4UuHZiJV6DbFbk9NVoaGo0H lnJUgPgejRKdbeiEQ/x6E2YVr08sd5gNXzCnwUzS5dNjb5KnP0YXokAcL 6pG5dZsCEw4QjxPVvD5bdVRgPeQVqJK1kJrzqTfxXK5lPS2xh4YSBi82p o=; Authentication-Results: esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none IronPort-SDR: W0cOlhBUV4DnLGq2gDEc1NCNhR932tcp5/Y+YsLB7PwiA8cKThwaunpOtSNhWvvlp5Wr6rLx0F W2A18XP4E+SFvNMbcDIqoFsA4rf8dtsH4TL9yXaFrrFH1MY6T9k+w5DO6EuuuB1iXU8eslcR2N m6wk86nEHJPn2dYAz4ylRzw9v5yDJMwX4oH24xGdKijsByCPUrzurAL43d/D35A8rF4J5j6yP4 Mybi2pSan9LhqBlpgr3JpuYkUOSf1dfwmue4oPmVjLLwGtjQzf47vwySVbSX/o3SMYpwKnpnbc r18= X-SBRS: None X-MesageID: 32019534 X-Ironport-Server: esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,374,1599537600"; d="scan'208";a="32019534" Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:24:07 +0000 To: Eduardo Habkost CC: Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , , Jiaxun Yang , Igor Mammedov , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini , Marcel Apfelbaum , "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" , Aurelien Jarno , Thomas Huth , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Aleksandar Rikalo , Richard Henderson , "Fam Zheng" , "Daniel P . Berrange" , "Stefano Stabellini" , Paul Durrant , Subject: Re: [PATCH-for-6.0 v4 15/17] gitlab-ci: Add test for Xen (on CentOS 7) Message-ID: <20201127142407.GC2098@perard.uk.xensource.com> References: <20201108204535.2319870-1-philmd@redhat.com> <20201108204535.2319870-16-philmd@redhat.com> <20201126173824.GB2098@perard.uk.xensource.com> <20201126174559.GP2271382@habkost.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201126174559.GP2271382@habkost.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.71.145.155; envelope-from=anthony.perard@citrix.com; helo=esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Reply-to: Anthony PERARD From: Anthony PERARD via On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 12:45:59PM -0500, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 05:38:24PM +0000, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > Is `make check` going to do something useful with the Xen support? Or is > > it going to need more work in order to test the Xen support of QEMU? > > (Like starting an actual Xen guest.) > > I don't think it will test Xen support, but we still want to at > least check if --enable-xen doesn't break anything else. That sound good. > Is there any public CI system anywhere where Xen support is > tested today? Yes, we have osstest which regularly test Xen with QEMU from upstream. Result are sent to xen-devel. But that might not be very useful for qemu-devel. We also have a GitLab CI which does some Xen tests, but I don't think QEMU is tested there. https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob;f=automation/gitlab-ci/test.yaml;hb=HEAD https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/ Cheers, -- Anthony PERARD From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAA7C64E75 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7947521D7A for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=citrix.com header.i=@citrix.com header.b="FMWqw4gh" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7947521D7A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=citrix.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.39479.72400 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kiefX-0007NG-TX; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:24:15 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 39479.72400; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:24:15 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kiefX-0007N9-QS; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:24:15 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 39479; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:24:15 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kiefX-0007N4-3C for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:24:15 +0000 Received: from esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.145.155]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 547d2cd6-08e4-4161-80ff-43340c591949; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kiefX-0007N4-3C for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:24:15 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 547d2cd6-08e4-4161-80ff-43340c591949 Received: from esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.145.155]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 547d2cd6-08e4-4161-80ff-43340c591949; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:24:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1606487054; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=D5L4R48jTaqMmWokScSU3RSjvbXkKn0bwvjerOZsofs=; b=FMWqw4gho2sUxs0mH13DIWvOaf47BqLp72ttAveQfJgXtDQrouI+nt7t tEJb6PT4bKeYQ0SZMg3c1/2zYHKTTGxFLWgdMUcL2G/jglvg2xXW8VgJr AK0UiUDHQ6OnvRKt10bRr9LH2unLsg1zHBYKy86+cG2UtPTerzcBHXY/4 8=; Authentication-Results: esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none IronPort-SDR: W0cOlhBUV4DnLGq2gDEc1NCNhR932tcp5/Y+YsLB7PwiA8cKThwaunpOtSNhWvvlp5Wr6rLx0F W2A18XP4E+SFvNMbcDIqoFsA4rf8dtsH4TL9yXaFrrFH1MY6T9k+w5DO6EuuuB1iXU8eslcR2N m6wk86nEHJPn2dYAz4ylRzw9v5yDJMwX4oH24xGdKijsByCPUrzurAL43d/D35A8rF4J5j6yP4 Mybi2pSan9LhqBlpgr3JpuYkUOSf1dfwmue4oPmVjLLwGtjQzf47vwySVbSX/o3SMYpwKnpnbc r18= X-SBRS: None X-MesageID: 32019534 X-Ironport-Server: esa3.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,374,1599537600"; d="scan'208";a="32019534" Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:24:07 +0000 From: Anthony PERARD To: Eduardo Habkost CC: Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , , Jiaxun Yang , Igor Mammedov , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paolo Bonzini , Marcel Apfelbaum , "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" , Aurelien Jarno , Thomas Huth , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Aleksandar Rikalo , Richard Henderson , "Fam Zheng" , "Daniel P . Berrange" , "Stefano Stabellini" , Paul Durrant , Subject: Re: [PATCH-for-6.0 v4 15/17] gitlab-ci: Add test for Xen (on CentOS 7) Message-ID: <20201127142407.GC2098@perard.uk.xensource.com> References: <20201108204535.2319870-1-philmd@redhat.com> <20201108204535.2319870-16-philmd@redhat.com> <20201126173824.GB2098@perard.uk.xensource.com> <20201126174559.GP2271382@habkost.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201126174559.GP2271382@habkost.net> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 12:45:59PM -0500, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 05:38:24PM +0000, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > Is `make check` going to do something useful with the Xen support? Or is > > it going to need more work in order to test the Xen support of QEMU? > > (Like starting an actual Xen guest.) > > I don't think it will test Xen support, but we still want to at > least check if --enable-xen doesn't break anything else. That sound good. > Is there any public CI system anywhere where Xen support is > tested today? Yes, we have osstest which regularly test Xen with QEMU from upstream. Result are sent to xen-devel. But that might not be very useful for qemu-devel. We also have a GitLab CI which does some Xen tests, but I don't think QEMU is tested there. https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob;f=automation/gitlab-ci/test.yaml;hb=HEAD https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen/ Cheers, -- Anthony PERARD