From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7746AC64E7A for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 14:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F5020758 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 14:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391551AbgLAOoE (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:44:04 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:50131 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387963AbgLAOoD (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:44:03 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 4CA9968AFE; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 15:43:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 15:43:14 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Thorsten Leemhuis , Christoph Hellwig , Randy Dunlap , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] LICENSES: Add the CC-BY-4.0 license Message-ID: <20201201144314.GA14256@lst.de> References: <20201124091852.GB11695@lst.de> <04eae024-811d-d11e-b8bd-52f0dd0e225f@leemhuis.info> <20201124093658.GA13174@lst.de> <20201124121109.GY4327@casper.infradead.org> <20201130075137.3b551bef@lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201130075137.3b551bef@lwn.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:51:37AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > We could also, if we saw fit, take the position that anything that has > been processed through the docs build is a derived product of the kernel > and must be GPL-licensed - any dual-licensing would be stripped by that > act. That, too, should address this concern, I think. > > In general I'd rather see fewer licenses in Documentation/ than more. But > Thorsten has put a lot of effort into this work; if he wants to > dual-license it in this way, my inclination is to accommodate him. But > that requires getting CC-BY-4.0 accepted into the LICENSES directory. > (That said, I believe it should go into LICENSES/dual/ rather than > preferred/). I agree with everything said above.