From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9505EC63777 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 08:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFDD20BED for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 08:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729917AbgLCIDv (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 03:03:51 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43960 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726451AbgLCIDv (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 03:03:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 08:02:40 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1606982590; bh=3WNTeY4jXrQb/zwGcpPko0lS4saBdyJwWL+052R9QOY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fEwo2wDaiWy1mWXQlH/jLj+TSFEXeYaexFq7JPUPexGbTD8ZFcD3QKpyLPnSJf8yI y8PEegg3NvchptSE8npvhoYR7/TvL2cyuVc++Vkw/OhrB9PZLVTXOSS1vUVM/jtCOC Jo2eT+yHPFDBxGHJtgq0vbM4I1NzWj7oBJN10VENUi5UJUo909teEfrpR3+ybRrEWZ VjnzV2/Ub4WP1Iuaguo759y5B9975bmbpY3CDuRGixABOAxbz1vszBYTCBg8IvVzBW oa3uUM9DgWqzjXGVE94qXlXnR5IxZKtiggeEzaEtXa67wMti+vGEMYhwCEWJKY5VDH 7Jd3Yy38EzI9w== From: Mark Brown To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: Maxim Kochetkov , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Use max_native_cs instead of num_chipselect to set SPI_MCR Message-ID: <20201203080240.GA4700@sirena.org.uk> References: <20201201085916.63543-1-fido_max@inbox.ru> <160683107678.35139.1439064414776102118.b4-ty@kernel.org> <20201202142220.GE5560@sirena.org.uk> <20201202235534.ksbpj6wfp7vkkwm2@skbuf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201202235534.ksbpj6wfp7vkkwm2@skbuf> X-Cookie: Sacred cows make great hamburgers. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 01:55:34AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 02:22:20PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > If the patch isn't actually applied then yes. > Do you frequently send out emails that you've applied a patch and then > not apply it? There was an issue the other day where b4 had a bug which caused it to send out mails for everything it had in its database, including things I'd downloaded to test but not applied for whatever reason. --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl/Im58ACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DdBAf/Sg7ClD4AUrPDo4819Z0oEpBqfxr8doNZK0ApaZH7GQ+z7U4SsVWXfX9K uxAsfjHxeVHxR+1XrRXZxXH3zrAGjrr8O8LrPDjDPGmjTdF/xliwCnTuvXuOi+RI buKmy6MMhZqqSHW7OSNdKbeiF8w2VljYiH1Ru9SI7LeiO/+6oIwRRKRGn4vX+SbD ven8DqwaSnpgG8MpckmL9osM0Xq8zUNpDHzARb0T6KfTsZvUxkSFnzJzrG6ccbX0 +5G+5WfIHlkxKR41pGgm3in/5l0SruIG59eRq+vIn5JZ3aWKPbojvRYNFbaau869 uJ7+5tNehqvPSXcE8R9TehXPtMfm3g== =pl6Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--