All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: remove recalc_thresholds from free space ops
Date: Thu,  3 Dec 2020 17:18:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201203161838.29392-1-dsterba@suse.com> (raw)

After removing the inode number cache that was using the free space
cache code, we can remove at least the recalc_thresholds callback from
the ops. Both code and tests use the same callback function. It's moved
before its first use.

The use_bitmaps callback is still needed by tests to create some
extents/bitmap setup.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c       | 86 +++++++++++++++----------------
 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.h       |  1 -
 fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tests.c |  1 -
 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
index cd5996350cf0..93d32b823e04 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
@@ -685,6 +685,44 @@ static int io_ctl_read_bitmap(struct btrfs_io_ctl *io_ctl,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void recalculate_thresholds(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl)
+{
+	struct btrfs_block_group *block_group = ctl->private;
+	u64 max_bytes;
+	u64 bitmap_bytes;
+	u64 extent_bytes;
+	u64 size = block_group->length;
+	u64 bytes_per_bg = BITS_PER_BITMAP * ctl->unit;
+	u64 max_bitmaps = div64_u64(size + bytes_per_bg - 1, bytes_per_bg);
+
+	max_bitmaps = max_t(u64, max_bitmaps, 1);
+
+	ASSERT(ctl->total_bitmaps <= max_bitmaps);
+
+	/*
+	 * We are trying to keep the total amount of memory used per 1GiB of
+	 * space to be MAX_CACHE_BYTES_PER_GIG.  However, with a reclamation
+	 * mechanism of pulling extents >= FORCE_EXTENT_THRESHOLD out of
+	 * bitmaps, we may end up using more memory than this.
+	 */
+	if (size < SZ_1G)
+		max_bytes = MAX_CACHE_BYTES_PER_GIG;
+	else
+		max_bytes = MAX_CACHE_BYTES_PER_GIG * div_u64(size, SZ_1G);
+
+	bitmap_bytes = ctl->total_bitmaps * ctl->unit;
+
+	/*
+	 * we want the extent entry threshold to always be at most 1/2 the max
+	 * bytes we can have, or whatever is less than that.
+	 */
+	extent_bytes = max_bytes - bitmap_bytes;
+	extent_bytes = min_t(u64, extent_bytes, max_bytes >> 1);
+
+	ctl->extents_thresh =
+		div_u64(extent_bytes, sizeof(struct btrfs_free_space));
+}
+
 static int __load_free_space_cache(struct btrfs_root *root, struct inode *inode,
 				   struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
 				   struct btrfs_path *path, u64 offset)
@@ -803,7 +841,7 @@ static int __load_free_space_cache(struct btrfs_root *root, struct inode *inode,
 			spin_lock(&ctl->tree_lock);
 			ret = link_free_space(ctl, e);
 			ctl->total_bitmaps++;
-			ctl->op->recalc_thresholds(ctl);
+			recalculate_thresholds(ctl);
 			spin_unlock(&ctl->tree_lock);
 			if (ret) {
 				btrfs_err(fs_info,
@@ -1720,44 +1758,6 @@ static int link_free_space(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void recalculate_thresholds(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl)
-{
-	struct btrfs_block_group *block_group = ctl->private;
-	u64 max_bytes;
-	u64 bitmap_bytes;
-	u64 extent_bytes;
-	u64 size = block_group->length;
-	u64 bytes_per_bg = BITS_PER_BITMAP * ctl->unit;
-	u64 max_bitmaps = div64_u64(size + bytes_per_bg - 1, bytes_per_bg);
-
-	max_bitmaps = max_t(u64, max_bitmaps, 1);
-
-	ASSERT(ctl->total_bitmaps <= max_bitmaps);
-
-	/*
-	 * We are trying to keep the total amount of memory used per 1GiB of
-	 * space to be MAX_CACHE_BYTES_PER_GIG.  However, with a reclamation
-	 * mechanism of pulling extents >= FORCE_EXTENT_THRESHOLD out of
-	 * bitmaps, we may end up using more memory than this.
-	 */
-	if (size < SZ_1G)
-		max_bytes = MAX_CACHE_BYTES_PER_GIG;
-	else
-		max_bytes = MAX_CACHE_BYTES_PER_GIG * div_u64(size, SZ_1G);
-
-	bitmap_bytes = ctl->total_bitmaps * ctl->unit;
-
-	/*
-	 * we want the extent entry threshold to always be at most 1/2 the max
-	 * bytes we can have, or whatever is less than that.
-	 */
-	extent_bytes = max_bytes - bitmap_bytes;
-	extent_bytes = min_t(u64, extent_bytes, max_bytes >> 1);
-
-	ctl->extents_thresh =
-		div_u64(extent_bytes, sizeof(struct btrfs_free_space));
-}
-
 static inline void __bitmap_clear_bits(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
 				       struct btrfs_free_space *info,
 				       u64 offset, u64 bytes)
@@ -1969,8 +1969,7 @@ static void add_new_bitmap(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&info->list);
 	link_free_space(ctl, info);
 	ctl->total_bitmaps++;
-
-	ctl->op->recalc_thresholds(ctl);
+	recalculate_thresholds(ctl);
 }
 
 static void free_bitmap(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
@@ -1992,7 +1991,7 @@ static void free_bitmap(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
 	kmem_cache_free(btrfs_free_space_bitmap_cachep, bitmap_info->bitmap);
 	kmem_cache_free(btrfs_free_space_cachep, bitmap_info);
 	ctl->total_bitmaps--;
-	ctl->op->recalc_thresholds(ctl);
+	recalculate_thresholds(ctl);
 }
 
 static noinline int remove_from_bitmap(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
@@ -2159,7 +2158,6 @@ static bool use_bitmap(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
 }
 
 static const struct btrfs_free_space_op free_space_op = {
-	.recalc_thresholds	= recalculate_thresholds,
 	.use_bitmap		= use_bitmap,
 };
 
@@ -3079,7 +3077,7 @@ u64 btrfs_alloc_from_cluster(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
 			kmem_cache_free(btrfs_free_space_bitmap_cachep,
 					entry->bitmap);
 			ctl->total_bitmaps--;
-			ctl->op->recalc_thresholds(ctl);
+			recalculate_thresholds(ctl);
 		} else if (!btrfs_free_space_trimmed(entry)) {
 			ctl->discardable_extents[BTRFS_STAT_CURR]--;
 		}
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.h b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.h
index a65ed1967d5d..b87e7ecf7373 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.h
@@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ struct btrfs_free_space_ctl {
 };
 
 struct btrfs_free_space_op {
-	void (*recalc_thresholds)(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl);
 	bool (*use_bitmap)(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
 			   struct btrfs_free_space *info);
 };
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tests.c
index aebdf23f0cdd..8f05c1eb833f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tests.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tests.c
@@ -399,7 +399,6 @@ test_steal_space_from_bitmap_to_extent(struct btrfs_block_group *cache,
 	u64 offset;
 	u64 max_extent_size;
 	const struct btrfs_free_space_op test_free_space_ops = {
-		.recalc_thresholds = cache->free_space_ctl->op->recalc_thresholds,
 		.use_bitmap = test_use_bitmap,
 	};
 	const struct btrfs_free_space_op *orig_free_space_ops;
-- 
2.25.0


             reply	other threads:[~2020-12-03 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-03 16:18 David Sterba [this message]
2020-12-04 19:11 ` [PATCH] btrfs: remove recalc_thresholds from free space ops Josef Bacik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201203161838.29392-1-dsterba@suse.com \
    --to=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.