From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E89C4361A for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 00:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261E3224B2 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 00:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727731AbgLDAgL (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 19:36:11 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49662 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726150AbgLDAgL (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 19:36:11 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x543.google.com (mail-ed1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::543]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA4F0C061A4F for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:35:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x543.google.com with SMTP id u19so4093155edx.2 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 16:35:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=b1/uhGE96UYOq0ubxB5CyQ6ODSVFXVsIA7jNr+G+ESY=; b=EI5+DeEBZuWOSGkucZplZ6wPdb2xtRyXwbbIpgvB+fZ184K9L3rDbnjFi+RxRA7AcQ hWcq37dJ2rrzbL0r7OeUQcBjZJ8zTXrGkfUQIwOHqHQ0hQ7Pc8KiaBwhcIXm+vz+ZS5f QOCvjLkvCp2v7TFU8UjeW3/q4GDxOUxvQeDBg1CUc2VsOTOvw8rWro34QnbqaUzAEp2m KQKd75qdq9IrPfvWzCpHYRL8JLOoMkxpSjUtv8fiNknePep8wZGKX9ES1BdrhzaJKsYV hb/bKt5nwgQAisq+uZgQQ3+X6/CcPCUW6sTIwSl9EPwD9fkcqhu6spfeb8tkXZCDPzMd atWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=b1/uhGE96UYOq0ubxB5CyQ6ODSVFXVsIA7jNr+G+ESY=; b=jNwYjOxBhvRggxsH5tYKyr0HfNI0Xs4AmijhJhCzrdhyLmgL37CUIiuVSTIiqtapXk OWDOiW7mN3fjKAvKeY8OqCSAClCfk5P4L1GhHfKBBOxomg1TVK3lKm68Aqbw4AjkjQrD 0bEF5uXuz9KR7HdFDwNUylWnM7kyXlyMukY63Gx/r1GadUhaPMpNPWTPCyFlbC8mVg0u gPpReZGk2sDqRoGqtjDB/6SPHxnZlSApjhp5e2AmwE0EJAW3CAK5hW9fNSKcSCQrwAY0 q+aHtekjMExnmMm6odpUuU6BXyjd/mf8LIHPqZgJcjClh72sUV0ULV3TEPFe3Ec2JbyA gwhw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5333rQfLawtuCvWIYzK2/IRkOyXSg85BUSXRQcA2BWodgNhW9mP6 bC4eSaqHnfIx0uo2KoRYi/Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyw+ZTfDd2teNm39zh3C9XYoGMQKWCCYS+D+m3SmYRYFpZamlyfpc0L+6CL0uvLoixhBHDmew== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d514:: with SMTP id y20mr5111149edq.384.1607042129332; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 16:35:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from skbuf ([188.25.2.120]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b13sm2206016edu.21.2020.12.03.16.35.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Dec 2020 16:35:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 02:35:27 +0200 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Tobias Waldekranz Cc: Andrew Lunn , davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, vivien.didelot@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, j.vosburgh@gmail.com, vfalico@gmail.com, andy@greyhouse.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/4] net: dsa: Link aggregation support Message-ID: <20201204003527.uvwyem3mlacr5cjp@skbuf> References: <20201202091356.24075-1-tobias@waldekranz.com> <20201202091356.24075-3-tobias@waldekranz.com> <20201203162428.ffdj7gdyudndphmn@skbuf> <87a6uu7gsr.fsf@waldekranz.com> <20201203210941.GJ2333853@lunn.ch> <877dpy7eun.fsf@waldekranz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877dpy7eun.fsf@waldekranz.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:35:12PM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote: > - If offloading is available, reject anything that can not be > offloaded. My guess is that _any_ hardware offloaded setup will almost > always yield a better solution for the user than a software fallback. For the case where the switch ports are not bridged, just under a bond, do you expect the hardware offloading to make any sort of difference? If you don't, then why would we deny software-applied bonding policies?