From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D4DC4361B for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 21:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952EF22581 for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 21:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727319AbgLEV16 (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Dec 2020 16:27:58 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37884 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726173AbgLEV16 (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Dec 2020 16:27:58 -0500 Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 13:27:16 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1607203637; bh=FD4PyLI/19p+zpfFll8rCI/9aR2mAR3+g29XkXnp8fg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TTX4lDSWJHCfeyKYmYD9VrgrqASPFYttBYRKKTns5roGvSnFK3Kq5CoKFGaPAR1hL G2QRaExRTzQMCPRCXh3Di3nJWQiZsvKKesb5zgry6C+j3XHay2YgZaSbJA/Rz6/GdL wqGIf4q7Rj7I816+wSsVd4rdJPLFOBlA8zmtp0heGz5DcD8FYqWuff6RFCb/meZCEB NQgnzrJvmNXJ4C93auUBsON/ISUhtdyHQrBPReZw/UYgC21OYyn8oIlihZ8FUscYsT Ey6OMIKZj3Q856OKy99W7lWinZA0ryZzXwxbGp7QesIxYBJv6CZ8XXkDEryf4Z+ozv scwKn5k/YSwHQ== From: Jakub Kicinski To: Rasmus Villemoes Cc: Li Yang , "David S. Miller" , Qiang Zhao , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Vladimir Oltean Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] ethernet: ucc_geth: assorted fixes and simplifications Message-ID: <20201205132716.4c68e35d@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <7e78df84-0035-6935-acb0-adbd0c648128@prevas.dk> References: <20201205191744.7847-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> <20201205125351.41e89579@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com> <7e78df84-0035-6935-acb0-adbd0c648128@prevas.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 22:11:39 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > Looks like a nice clean up on a quick look. > > > > Please separate patches 1 and 11 (which are the two bug fixes I see) > > I think patch 2 is a bug fix as well, but I'd like someone from NXP to > comment. Sure, makes sense. > > rebase (retest) and post them against the net tree: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/ > > So I thought this would go through Li Yang's tree. That's where my > previous QE related patches have gone through, and at least some need > some input from NXP folks - and what MAINTAINERS suggests. So not > marking the patches with net or net-next was deliberate. But I'm happy > to rearrange and send to net/net-next as appropriate if that's what you > and Li Yang can agree to. Ah, now I noticed you didn't CC all of the patches to netdev. Please don't do that, build bots won't be able to validate partially posted patches. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B17C433FE for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 21:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C8B622581 for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 21:31:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6C8B622581 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CpN6j2KxzzDqlW for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 08:31:09 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=kuba@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=TTX4lDSW; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CpN2K1hcCzDqNv for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 08:27:20 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 13:27:16 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1607203637; bh=FD4PyLI/19p+zpfFll8rCI/9aR2mAR3+g29XkXnp8fg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TTX4lDSWJHCfeyKYmYD9VrgrqASPFYttBYRKKTns5roGvSnFK3Kq5CoKFGaPAR1hL G2QRaExRTzQMCPRCXh3Di3nJWQiZsvKKesb5zgry6C+j3XHay2YgZaSbJA/Rz6/GdL wqGIf4q7Rj7I816+wSsVd4rdJPLFOBlA8zmtp0heGz5DcD8FYqWuff6RFCb/meZCEB NQgnzrJvmNXJ4C93auUBsON/ISUhtdyHQrBPReZw/UYgC21OYyn8oIlihZ8FUscYsT Ey6OMIKZj3Q856OKy99W7lWinZA0ryZzXwxbGp7QesIxYBJv6CZ8XXkDEryf4Z+ozv scwKn5k/YSwHQ== From: Jakub Kicinski To: Rasmus Villemoes Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] ethernet: ucc_geth: assorted fixes and simplifications Message-ID: <20201205132716.4c68e35d@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <7e78df84-0035-6935-acb0-adbd0c648128@prevas.dk> References: <20201205191744.7847-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> <20201205125351.41e89579@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com> <7e78df84-0035-6935-acb0-adbd0c648128@prevas.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Yang , Vladimir Oltean , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Qiang Zhao Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 22:11:39 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > Looks like a nice clean up on a quick look. > > > > Please separate patches 1 and 11 (which are the two bug fixes I see) > > I think patch 2 is a bug fix as well, but I'd like someone from NXP to > comment. Sure, makes sense. > > rebase (retest) and post them against the net tree: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/ > > So I thought this would go through Li Yang's tree. That's where my > previous QE related patches have gone through, and at least some need > some input from NXP folks - and what MAINTAINERS suggests. So not > marking the patches with net or net-next was deliberate. But I'm happy > to rearrange and send to net/net-next as appropriate if that's what you > and Li Yang can agree to. Ah, now I noticed you didn't CC all of the patches to netdev. Please don't do that, build bots won't be able to validate partially posted patches. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7151BC4361A for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 21:29:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27F3720825 for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 21:29:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 27F3720825 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ELvh9N1RCmdi5hSR4fzJSL9MlT43MQbvuTvNJ/p/xwY=; b=3IoFl95pmh6Ax314wCmBezYqJ Oi6zXWA/rPMREkE1soQmseF8tuv31gUmU1Vv4pBAJ8/8vtJZ/JoB80cG7ys9PaQF4qDxhV2TzkqLM ixrsfQPASzIIk9wI5u0nq1mBye9KQVN5Kzm/r82R8jZHxLrEKPbjiBteSH3IIBWxCpTRmaBqmBZdX Ymvo3WZXRcXmx4VRH8MS9JcSeRRTlriLxnz6ps0BWtWSkyyRg7A4GAC2licmfaXp549LUDzTbzuRb 8lYLOSpKbYK2SL+CMgVJah2VcpBNeBB43tzcf9je8tOrijM9/06u/5aslvzb3HVrsmK4jxkjDducM Topmersrw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1klf5N-0004mq-Qn; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 21:27:21 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1klf5K-0004mT-W0 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 21:27:19 +0000 Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 13:27:16 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1607203637; bh=FD4PyLI/19p+zpfFll8rCI/9aR2mAR3+g29XkXnp8fg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TTX4lDSWJHCfeyKYmYD9VrgrqASPFYttBYRKKTns5roGvSnFK3Kq5CoKFGaPAR1hL G2QRaExRTzQMCPRCXh3Di3nJWQiZsvKKesb5zgry6C+j3XHay2YgZaSbJA/Rz6/GdL wqGIf4q7Rj7I816+wSsVd4rdJPLFOBlA8zmtp0heGz5DcD8FYqWuff6RFCb/meZCEB NQgnzrJvmNXJ4C93auUBsON/ISUhtdyHQrBPReZw/UYgC21OYyn8oIlihZ8FUscYsT Ey6OMIKZj3Q856OKy99W7lWinZA0ryZzXwxbGp7QesIxYBJv6CZ8XXkDEryf4Z+ozv scwKn5k/YSwHQ== From: Jakub Kicinski To: Rasmus Villemoes Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] ethernet: ucc_geth: assorted fixes and simplifications Message-ID: <20201205132716.4c68e35d@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <7e78df84-0035-6935-acb0-adbd0c648128@prevas.dk> References: <20201205191744.7847-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> <20201205125351.41e89579@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com> <7e78df84-0035-6935-acb0-adbd0c648128@prevas.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201205_162719_172657_AE144629 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.99 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Yang , Vladimir Oltean , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Qiang Zhao Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 22:11:39 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > Looks like a nice clean up on a quick look. > > > > Please separate patches 1 and 11 (which are the two bug fixes I see) > > I think patch 2 is a bug fix as well, but I'd like someone from NXP to > comment. Sure, makes sense. > > rebase (retest) and post them against the net tree: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/ > > So I thought this would go through Li Yang's tree. That's where my > previous QE related patches have gone through, and at least some need > some input from NXP folks - and what MAINTAINERS suggests. So not > marking the patches with net or net-next was deliberate. But I'm happy > to rearrange and send to net/net-next as appropriate if that's what you > and Li Yang can agree to. Ah, now I noticed you didn't CC all of the patches to netdev. Please don't do that, build bots won't be able to validate partially posted patches. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel