[PATCH 5.4 21/39] inet_ecn: Fix endianness of checksum update when setting ECT(1)

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8, Size: 1347 bytes --]

From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 2867e1eac61016f59b3d730e3f7aa488e186e917 ]

When adding support for propagating ECT(1) marking in IP headers it seems I
suffered from endianness-confusion in the checksum update calculation: In
fact the ECN field is in the *lower* bits of the first 16-bit word of the
IP header when calculating in network byte order. This means that the
addition performed to update the checksum field was wrong; let's fix that.

Fixes: b723748750ec ("tunnel: Propagate ECT(1) when decapsulating as recommended by RFC6040")
Reported-by: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201130183705.17540-1-toke@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 include/net/inet_ecn.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/include/net/inet_ecn.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_ecn.h
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static inline int IP_ECN_set_ect1(struct
 	if ((iph->tos & INET_ECN_MASK) != INET_ECN_ECT_0)
 		return 0;
 
-	check += (__force u16)htons(0x100);
+	check += (__force u16)htons(0x1);
 
 	iph->check = (__force __sum16)(check + (check>=0xFFFF));
 	iph->tos ^= INET_ECN_MASK;