From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7008BC433FE for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 05:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACA02080C for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 05:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726063AbgLHFSd (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 00:18:33 -0500 Received: from wtarreau.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:48282 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725768AbgLHFSd (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 00:18:33 -0500 Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0B85HZYx007069; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 06:17:35 +0100 Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 06:17:35 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Nicolas Ferre , Claudiu Beznea , Daniel Palmer , Alexandre Belloni , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: macb: should we revert 0a4e9ce17ba7 ("macb: support the two tx descriptors on at91rm9200") ? Message-ID: <20201208051735.GA7061@1wt.eu> References: <20201206092041.GA10646@1wt.eu> <20201207154042.46414640@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201207154042.46414640@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 03:40:42PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > Thanks for the report, I remember that one. In hindsight maybe we > should have punted it to 5.11... Well, not necessarily as it was simple, well documented and *appeared* to work fine. > Let's revert ASAP, 5.10 is going to be LTS, people will definitely > notice. It could take some time as we're speaking about crazy people running 5.10 on an old 180 MHz MCU :-) > Would you mind sending a revert patch with the explanation in the > commit message? Sure, will do. Thanks! Willy