From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA65C4361B for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8FA23B03 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729336AbgLHUyW (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:54:22 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43126 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726114AbgLHUyU (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:54:20 -0500 Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2002:c35c:fd02::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F00D3C0613D6; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:53:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kmjz7-00HUxg-Md; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 20:53:21 +0000 Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:53:21 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Nathan Chancellor , Greg KH , Alexey Dobriyan , linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com, Stephen Hemminger , Wei Liu , linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] seq_file: add seq_read_iter Message-ID: <20201208205321.GI3579531@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20201115233814.GT3576660@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20201115235149.GA252@Ryzen-9-3900X.localdomain> <20201116002513.GU3576660@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20201116003416.GA345@Ryzen-9-3900X.localdomain> <20201116032942.GV3576660@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20201127162902.GA11665@lst.de> <20201208163552.GA15052@lst.de> <20201208194935.GH3579531@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 12:25:55PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:49 AM Al Viro wrote: > > > > Said that, it does appear to survive all beating, and it does fix > > a regression introduced in this cycle, so, provided that amount of > > comments in there is OK with you... > > Ok, considering Greg's note, I've pulled it. It's early in the last > week, if something comes up we can still fix it. > > That said, considering that I think the only use-case was that odd > /proc splice use, and the really special WSL2 thing, and both of those > are verified, it does sound safe to pull. > > Famous last words... > > Al, since you're around, would you mind looking at the two > DCACHE_DONTCACHE patches too? Honestly, since they seem to be an issue > only for DAX, and only for DAX policy changes, I don't consider them > critical for 5.10, but they've been around for a while now. Umm... I've got fs: Handle I_DONTCACHE in iput_final() instead of generic_drop_inode() and fs: Kill DCACHE_DONTCACHE dentry even if DCACHE_REFERENCED is set in "to apply" pile; if that's what you are talking about, I don't think they are anywhere critical enough for 5.10-final, but I might be missing something... Al, still buried under piles of email ;-/