From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Oleksii Kurochko <olkuroch@cisco.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] rbd: remove the ->set_read_only method
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:52:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201209025236.GE1217988@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201208162829.2424563-6-hch@lst.de>
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 05:28:28PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Now that the hardware read-only state can't be changed by the BLKROSET
> ioctl, the code in this method is not required anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/rbd.c | 19 -------------------
> 1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index 2ed79b09439a82..2c64ca15ca079f 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -692,29 +692,10 @@ static void rbd_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
> put_device(&rbd_dev->dev);
> }
>
> -static int rbd_set_read_only(struct block_device *bdev, bool ro)
> -{
> - struct rbd_device *rbd_dev = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
> -
> - /*
> - * Both images mapped read-only and snapshots can't be marked
> - * read-write.
> - */
> - if (!ro) {
> - if (rbd_is_ro(rbd_dev))
> - return -EROFS;
> -
> - rbd_assert(!rbd_is_snap(rbd_dev));
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static const struct block_device_operations rbd_bd_ops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .open = rbd_open,
> .release = rbd_release,
> - .set_read_only = rbd_set_read_only,
> };
>
> /*
> --
> 2.29.2
>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
--
Ming
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
Oleksii Kurochko <olkuroch@cisco.com>,
Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] rbd: remove the ->set_read_only method
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:52:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201209025236.GE1217988@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201208162829.2424563-6-hch@lst.de>
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 05:28:28PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Now that the hardware read-only state can't be changed by the BLKROSET
> ioctl, the code in this method is not required anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/rbd.c | 19 -------------------
> 1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index 2ed79b09439a82..2c64ca15ca079f 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -692,29 +692,10 @@ static void rbd_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
> put_device(&rbd_dev->dev);
> }
>
> -static int rbd_set_read_only(struct block_device *bdev, bool ro)
> -{
> - struct rbd_device *rbd_dev = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
> -
> - /*
> - * Both images mapped read-only and snapshots can't be marked
> - * read-write.
> - */
> - if (!ro) {
> - if (rbd_is_ro(rbd_dev))
> - return -EROFS;
> -
> - rbd_assert(!rbd_is_snap(rbd_dev));
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static const struct block_device_operations rbd_bd_ops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .open = rbd_open,
> .release = rbd_release,
> - .set_read_only = rbd_set_read_only,
> };
>
> /*
> --
> 2.29.2
>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
--
Ming
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
Oleksii Kurochko <olkuroch@cisco.com>,
Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 5/6] rbd: remove the ->set_read_only method
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:52:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201209025236.GE1217988@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201208162829.2424563-6-hch@lst.de>
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 05:28:28PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Now that the hardware read-only state can't be changed by the BLKROSET
> ioctl, the code in this method is not required anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/rbd.c | 19 -------------------
> 1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index 2ed79b09439a82..2c64ca15ca079f 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -692,29 +692,10 @@ static void rbd_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
> put_device(&rbd_dev->dev);
> }
>
> -static int rbd_set_read_only(struct block_device *bdev, bool ro)
> -{
> - struct rbd_device *rbd_dev = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
> -
> - /*
> - * Both images mapped read-only and snapshots can't be marked
> - * read-write.
> - */
> - if (!ro) {
> - if (rbd_is_ro(rbd_dev))
> - return -EROFS;
> -
> - rbd_assert(!rbd_is_snap(rbd_dev));
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static const struct block_device_operations rbd_bd_ops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .open = rbd_open,
> .release = rbd_release,
> - .set_read_only = rbd_set_read_only,
> };
>
> /*
> --
> 2.29.2
>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
--
Ming
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-09 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-08 16:28 split hard read-only vs read-only policy v3 Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] dm: use bdev_read_only to check if a device is read-only Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: remove the NULL bdev check in bdev_read_only Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-08 16:45 ` [dm-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-08 16:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-08 16:28 ` [PATCH 3/6] block: add a hard-readonly flag to struct gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: propagate BLKROSET on the whole device to all partitions Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:47 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-08 16:47 ` [dm-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-08 16:47 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-09 2:51 ` Ming Lei
2020-12-09 2:51 ` [dm-devel] " Ming Lei
2020-12-09 2:51 ` Ming Lei
2020-12-08 16:28 ` [PATCH 5/6] rbd: remove the ->set_read_only method Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-09 2:52 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-12-09 2:52 ` [dm-devel] " Ming Lei
2020-12-09 2:52 ` Ming Lei
2020-12-08 16:28 ` [PATCH 6/6] nvme: allow revalidate to set a namespace read-only Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 16:49 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-08 16:49 ` [dm-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-08 16:49 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-09 2:54 ` Ming Lei
2020-12-09 2:54 ` [dm-devel] " Ming Lei
2020-12-09 2:54 ` Ming Lei
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-09 10:42 split hard read-only vs read-only policy v3 (resend) Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-09 10:42 ` [PATCH 5/6] rbd: remove the ->set_read_only method Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-09 10:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19 split hard read-only vs read-only policy v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19 ` [PATCH 5/6] rbd: remove the ->set_read_only method Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 13:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 14:57 ` Ilya Dryomov
2020-12-07 14:57 ` Ilya Dryomov
2020-12-08 5:30 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-08 5:30 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201209025236.GE1217988@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=dongsheng.yang@easystack.cn \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=olkuroch@cisco.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.