All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] xfs: move on-disk inode allocation out of xfs_ialloc()
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 08:52:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201209075246.GA10645@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201208122003.3158922-4-hsiangkao@redhat.com>

> +	/* Initialise the newly allocated inode. */
> +	return xfs_init_new_inode(*tpp, dp, ino, mode, nlink, rdev, prid);

IMHO this comment is not overly helpful..

> +	if (IS_ERR(ip)) {
> +		error = PTR_ERR(ip);
> +		ip = NULL;
>  		goto out_trans_cancel;
> +	}

And the calling convention with the ERR_PTR return does not seem to
fit the call chain to well.  But those are minor details, so:

>  STATIC int
>  xfs_qm_qino_alloc(
> -	xfs_mount_t	*mp,
> -	xfs_inode_t	**ip,
> -	uint		flags)
> +	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
> +	struct xfs_inode	**ipp,
> +	unsigned int		flags)
>  {
>  	xfs_trans_t	*tp;
>  	int		error;
>  	bool		need_alloc = true;

Why do you reindent and de-typdefify the arguments, but not the local
variables?

All the stuff below also seems to deal with the fact that the old return
ip by reference calling convention seems to actually work better with
the code base..

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-09  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-08 12:19 [PATCH v4 0/6] xfs: some xfs_dialloc() cleanup Gao Xiang
2020-12-08 12:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] xfs: convert noroom, okalloc in xfs_dialloc() to bool Gao Xiang
2020-12-08 12:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] xfs: introduce xfs_dialloc_roll() Gao Xiang
2020-12-08 23:09   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-08 23:36     ` Gao Xiang
2020-12-08 12:20 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] xfs: move on-disk inode allocation out of xfs_ialloc() Gao Xiang
2020-12-08 23:09   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-09  7:52   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-12-09  8:43     ` Gao Xiang
2020-12-09 10:22       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-09 11:13         ` Gao Xiang
2020-12-08 12:20 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] xfs: move xfs_dialloc_roll() into xfs_dialloc() Gao Xiang
2020-12-08 12:20 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] xfs: spilt xfs_dialloc() into 2 functions Gao Xiang
2020-12-09  7:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 12:20 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] xfs: kill ialloced in xfs_dialloc() Gao Xiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201209075246.GA10645@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hsiangkao@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.