From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2746C4361B for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:56:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 924C823D50 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:56:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 924C823D50 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xen.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.49498.87547 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1knOJ9-0006rU-Va; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:56:43 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 49498.87547; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:56:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1knOJ9-0006rN-SO; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:56:43 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 49498; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:56:42 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1knOJ8-0006rG-7b for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:56:42 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com (unknown [209.85.128.67]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 97e56119-6fb4-4c32-8946-96529e4560ad; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id y23so5843888wmi.1 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 07:56:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from liuwe-devbox-debian-v2 ([51.145.34.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q143sm10724375wme.28.2020.12.10.07.56.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 07:56:40 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 97e56119-6fb4-4c32-8946-96529e4560ad X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=CRecanxbOToTOHGblZx5e7biwudfKmBvFc15XWLYY80=; b=e5nQXa3xjaj5tFDBJRfnVl6UyDgPmXBC7TEcg8t7tbob3XQ7E63i4yDB9vUqRBDdSC 3eM/dUw8/4vFAU6oq/Afc9KvO8pD+1KY+DCFVQB1ZW2ITFRgo+Jy36Dp5lrWcyEB9r0Z Fc652aO7H20KMfh13v9fAB4+3Ro5ZHbTC52bLqk++/qQvn36bIzGAGK/QnXK0dOSxxZx GfvJLIJBybQJDll5ZiWacJdNvO6a0Yrql2jN90umF3El5WgXzAq3zkit8QkPw18685WM OTZw4XuqPPuwkTbikKj8vUGu9BeslAd2KjIny6G95bwPnzCQOOdNOCrlDMycG599tMMl r9Sg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532m/pPO30gMsDQZmAul6u80DWz96sAH+pD3uSUZo7VId+nOpv5V oFYdRCO7e7/gq4FfKyW6qCM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwfl2y6tpNzmSJ22RXmEs18D6WlT1Gp+0DvFxRI6nVQQQxF1/+JtL/K1EcbwxbR6cN3hUkNpA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:208:: with SMTP id 8mr9103445wmi.143.1607615800613; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 07:56:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:56:38 +0000 From: Wei Liu To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Wei Liu , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, famzheng@amazon.com, cardoe@cardoe.com, Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com, julien@xen.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/25] xl / libxl: named PCI pass-through devices Message-ID: <20201210155638.mxjx4zmjqmcpk7z3@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2> References: <160746448732.12203.10647684023172140005@600e7e483b3a> <20201209161433.d7xpx5zwtikd3fmk@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 06:41:03PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Wei Liu wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 05:02:50PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > The pipeline failed because the "fedora-gcc-debug" build failed with a > > > > timeout: > > > > > > > > ERROR: Job failed: execution took longer than 1h0m0s seconds > > > > > > > > given that all the other jobs passed (including the other Fedora job), I > > > > take this failed because the gitlab-ci x86 runners were overloaded? > > > > > > > > > > The CI system is configured to auto-scale as the number of jobs grows. > > > The limit is set to 10 (VMs) at the moment. > > > > > > https://gitlab.com/xen-project/xen-gitlab-ci/-/commit/832bfd72ea3a227283bf3df88b418a9aae95a5a4 > > > > > > I haven't looked at the log, but the number of build jobs looks rather > > > larger than when we get started. Maybe the limit of 10 is not good > > > enough? > > > > Interesting! That's only for the x86 runners, not the ARM runners (we > > only have 1 ARM64 runner), is that right? > > > > If we could increase the number of VMs for x86 I think that would be > > helpful because we have very many x86 jobs. > > I don't know what is going on but at the moment there seems to be only > one x86 build active > (https://gitlab.com/xen-project/patchew/xen/-/pipelines/227280736). > Should there be at least 3 of them? Not sure what you meant here. That pipeline is green. It may take some time for the CI to scale up if it is "cold". By default there is only 1 standby runner to reduce cost. Wei.