From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10179C433FE for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 17:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA60F23DC2 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 17:35:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2395146AbgLKQaB (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 11:30:01 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34990 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2406751AbgLKQ3n (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 11:29:43 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x843.google.com (mail-qt1-x843.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::843]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09E54C0613CF for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 08:29:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x843.google.com with SMTP id y15so6809177qtv.5 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 08:29:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=Pg6occ+XDGUtKScupx65iGAg2VYQ8ZDvmjdHkQMZn5c=; b=QuUZJcV8a89j8JgDWhHcI3UFbQIlD0itsbq54D+BNt62zmFHML7sv2G56bbyu3gud+ hyfNtZFOxLkz8HjZXzx0cjcRp2RgLdI6vcWT3WC+9C2lABXPjS+x3BnGkhtis+F0pqi5 NGRIN6PvYDKJQS5f5YmTdHM31e1l4wLSGIK++ayk+9cRGLacuFqox+W9I56o80VlU3Ds u2qaiA95Oh4CsfTizzbiMS5+6rIroZH46iy2S6T/cRXIQA3GTz0bkyX63U3Z6iGpOM8g 1h5y1Ds/bq3yhy8HfB2wsSsY69lHwZC9P/VnTea3woP2jODvp4LZQrH3vYrLzIYbYdQD u5iA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=Pg6occ+XDGUtKScupx65iGAg2VYQ8ZDvmjdHkQMZn5c=; b=Zv4H9rm0WR+4l2SvZKOiWqkNaRd6tIC4jy9k+u90BS0oCHnjaxLwsPnuHgVUKViyQv RDs/aXm5pv7nPfoKygwBs4sGEw6Q+yy9qHnVw+6w/oOVo7oFU5EWeflRqMWKDxGn+nXO bguT1oc9Jj5/70b8st1xzqR+2bqLcXh6kkrbC32l07HAYVx9ahnm5L1QELMGAMhkMM3h Z8rJPV23Y+eBA2Nujs0wpG5dvS9ZnyTb/fyT8IT7P6kif2dSt+oXRIBMCfTfu6g8VIpe 5xRdGwLVtkjyfKCm3aBCoiOPb1vnhb8B3FKiCpEtVbBWMcWvR27ukeJKcuzDPEJh2Hgk ZUeg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530CqGNlbqDoJ3EMW1Gf5qpQaCoxJG66C3Nk1A4v5mxsTjIkTU30 9/zF3f6kfy+Bh74q8JzZnPNSyA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyV9TPpNRrYTvyw22Ur2oi24U94ls2YwyQHkyXhuL/1p6qdaM0HiclC1FtM3XN8vWj3iHJXFw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:d0a:: with SMTP id q10mr16523207qti.25.1607704142308; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 08:29:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-142-162-115-133.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [142.162.115.133]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z26sm7371107qki.40.2020.12.11.08.29.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 08:29:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from jgg by mlx with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1knlHw-009Fmm-VS; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:29:00 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:29:00 -0400 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Jack Wang Cc: Bart Van Assche , Danil Kipnis , Doug Ledford , Guoqing Jiang , Jinpu Wang , Leon Romanovsky , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 02/18] RMDA/rtrs-srv: Occasionally flush ongoing session closing Message-ID: <20201211162900.GC5487@ziepe.ca> References: <20201209164542.61387-1-jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com> <20201209164542.61387-3-jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com> <20201211072600.GA192848@unreal> <20201211134543.GB5487@ziepe.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 05:17:36PM +0100, Jack Wang wrote: > En, the lockdep was complaining about the new conn_id, I will > post the full log if needed next week. let’s skip this patch for > now, will double check! That is even more worrysome as the new conn_id already has a different lock class. Jason