All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: fam@euphon.net, kwolf@redhat.com, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com,
	berto@igalia.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com,
	stefanha@redhat.com, den@openvz.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes()
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 21:39:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201211183934.169161-11-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201211183934.169161-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

We are generally moving to int64_t for both offset and bytes parameters
on all io paths.

Main motivation is realization of 64-bit write_zeroes operation for
fast zeroing large disk chunks, up to the whole disk.

We chose signed type, to be consistent with off_t (which is signed) and
with possibility for signed return type (where negative value means
error).

So, prepare bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes() now.

Callers are safe, as converting int to int64_t is safe. Concentrate on
'bytes' usage in the function (thx to Eric Blake):

    compute 'int tail' via % 'int alignment' - safe
    fragmentation loop 'int num' - still fragments with a cap on
      max_transfer

    use of 'num' within the loop
    MIN(bytes, max_transfer) as well as %alignment - still works, so
         calculations in if (head) {} are safe
    clamp size by 'int max_write_zeroes' - safe
    drv->bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes(int) - safe because of clamping
    clamp size by 'int max_transfer' - safe
    buf allocation is still clamped to max_transfer
    qemu_iovec_init_buf(size_t) - safe because of clamping
    bdrv_driver_pwritev(uint64_t) - safe

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
---
 block/io.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index b2bf18038b..c6a476559a 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
 
 static void bdrv_parent_cb_resize(BlockDriverState *bs);
 static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
-    int64_t offset, int bytes, BdrvRequestFlags flags);
+    int64_t offset, int64_t bytes, BdrvRequestFlags flags);
 
 static void bdrv_parent_drained_begin(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *ignore,
                                       bool ignore_bds_parents)
@@ -1791,7 +1791,7 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_preadv_part(BdrvChild *child,
 }
 
 static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
-    int64_t offset, int bytes, BdrvRequestFlags flags)
+    int64_t offset, int64_t bytes, BdrvRequestFlags flags)
 {
     BlockDriver *drv = bs->drv;
     QEMUIOVector qiov;
@@ -1806,6 +1806,8 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
                         bs->bl.request_alignment);
     int max_transfer = MIN_NON_ZERO(bs->bl.max_transfer, MAX_BOUNCE_BUFFER);
 
+    bdrv_check_request(offset, bytes, &error_abort);
+
     if (!drv) {
         return -ENOMEDIUM;
     }
@@ -1821,7 +1823,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
     assert(max_write_zeroes >= bs->bl.request_alignment);
 
     while (bytes > 0 && !ret) {
-        int num = bytes;
+        int64_t num = bytes;
 
         /* Align request.  Block drivers can expect the "bulk" of the request
          * to be aligned, and that unaligned requests do not cross cluster
-- 
2.25.4



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-11 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-11 18:39 [PATCH v4 00/16] 64bit block-layer: part I Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] block: refactor bdrv_check_request: add errp Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-20 22:20   ` Eric Blake
2021-01-22 19:33   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] util/iov: make qemu_iovec_init_extended() honest Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-21 21:58   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] block: fix theoretical overflow in bdrv_init_padding() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-21 22:42   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] block/io: refactor bdrv_pad_request(): move bdrv_pad_request() up Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-21 22:50   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] block/io: bdrv_pad_request(): support qemu_iovec_init_extended failure Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-21 22:53   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] block/throttle-groups: throttle_group_co_io_limits_intercept(): 64bit bytes Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] block/io: improve bdrv_check_request: check qiov too Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 14:48   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] block: use int64_t as bytes type in tracked requests Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 14:50   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] block/io: use int64_t bytes in driver wrappers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:02   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2021-01-22 16:18   ` [PATCH v4 10/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes() Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_aligned_pwritev() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:26   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:34   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_aligned_preadv() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:54   ` Eric Blake
2021-01-23 14:34     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_p{read, write}v_part() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy via
2021-01-22 17:00   ` [PATCH v4 14/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_p{read,write}v_part() Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in read/write wrappers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 17:22   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] block/io: use int64_t bytes in copy_range Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 18:29   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-14 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] 64bit block-layer: part I Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-09 10:13 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02  2:56 ` Eric Blake
2021-02-02  6:50   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02 14:59   ` Eric Blake
2021-02-02 16:13   ` iotest failures in head [was: [PATCH v4 00/16] 64bit block-layer: part I] Eric Blake
2021-02-02 16:23     ` Kevin Wolf
2021-02-02 16:29       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02 18:50         ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02 22:47         ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-03 10:45           ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-04 15:18             ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201211183934.169161-11-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=berto@igalia.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.