From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B88C3526C for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 06:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A733D23371 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 06:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726123AbgLPGvg (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2020 01:51:36 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44070 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726119AbgLPGvf (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2020 01:51:35 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:50:50 +0200 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Saeed Mahameed , Alexander Duyck , "David S. Miller" , Jason Gunthorpe , Netdev , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern , Jacob Keller , Sridhar Samudrala , "Ertman, David M" , Dan Williams , Kiran Patil , Greg KH Subject: Re: [net-next v4 00/15] Add mlx5 subfunction support Message-ID: <20201216065050.GR5005@unreal> References: <20201214214352.198172-1-saeed@kernel.org> <608505778d76b1b01cb3e8d19ecda5b8578f0f79.camel@kernel.org> <20201215132805.22ddcd44@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201215132805.22ddcd44@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 01:28:05PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:35:20 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > > I think the big thing we really should do if we are going to go this > > > route is to look at standardizing what the flavours are that get > > > created by the parent netdevice. Otherwise we are just creating the > > > same mess we had with SRIOV all over again and muddying the waters of > > > mediated devices. > > > > yes in the near future we will be working on auxbus interfaces for > > auto-probing and user flavor selection, this is a must have feature for > > us. > > Can you elaborate? I thought config would be via devlink. Yes, everything continues to be done through devlink. One of the immediate features is an ability to disable/enable creation of specific SF types. For example, if user doesn't want RDMA, the SF RDMA won't be created. Thanks