From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D02C4361B for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 10:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAA42335A for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 10:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726250AbgLPKma (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2020 05:42:30 -0500 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:14227 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726047AbgLPKm3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2020 05:42:29 -0500 IronPort-SDR: PYx6VPTky5xuzEc2VHbvMSowYImE5UtWp/jR2nRmJvHJAoJcAkRSPUTJoJFtjBk+CtGwobcy4R nrx4OirdCs1Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9836"; a="154274366" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,424,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="154274366" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Dec 2020 02:40:43 -0800 IronPort-SDR: HCj74Sc9DSc8oSLED6DSYpCg+xXP3Ip0x3YLNIg/qPrEORcV5TEwJ/TiF7yFXW4UF7GW8cqyWj uKhSfnc/aPjg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,424,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="337444957" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Dec 2020 02:40:41 -0800 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kpUFa-00EjX5-Vv; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 12:41:42 +0200 Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 12:41:42 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: David Gow Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Shuah Khan , Brendan Higgins , Mark Brown , Linux-MM , "Vaittinen, Matti" , mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, Vitor Massaru Iha Subject: Re: [patch 18/95] lib/list_kunit: follow new file name convention for KUnit tests Message-ID: <20201216104142.GY4077@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20201215204156.f05ec694b907845bcfab5c44@linux-foundation.org> <20201216044316.LYocMD9yH%akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 02:53:10PM +0800, David Gow wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 2:02 PM Linus Torvalds > wrote: ... > > Don't send me any more rename patches until your tools can actually do renames. > My other thought is that this sort of patchset really makes more sense > to push through the kselftest/kunit branch anyway, as all of the > changes were really more KUnit related than anything else. Does it > make sense to re-submit this that way? I think it makes sense because this is driven by rules set up by kselftest/kunit. My main concern here is to have cmdline_kunit in the tree (it is a new file). Renaming is up to you, I just wanted to be consistent with names and KUnit documentation. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko