From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AD9C4361B for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8862376F for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729151AbgLQRyG (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2020 12:54:06 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:60270 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726548AbgLQRyG (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2020 12:54:06 -0500 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1746B2E6; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:53:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 1746B2E6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1608227605; bh=jKZ1GzV4hDFyMBVEKA263kBGGBD1geznHekza+FysnA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aZMtYT+89Wga5d/MpnF4YqfKyR9YzklJG+iy1uSWhMe5/Py/Uz+aywt02n8WvxDyd tnJ3wjA72OFJ1VE7S9N8wPkcW6dUzmGXAWskKroEQgDOAvKvP6xUHDVddv5uh3hxMe la7Lgl08SUwjjYAp69IngsOBkFvbhzFOWpQGPCtiOkKK0fOOVhmzWWsef9J85eYcbq HcIl0kmCh8BAqXa+z/5TGFAK8ULNsdv217iTYALsTLi5Cx2LMOzYFBQB3RXAS4qzH8 IQKUEYhv1AWMSkHcMQEU/7n6Wv+ZFn3XDvdT6V/P5aPSVm8mW8Ewlj0FPsipmk5VER UneKDQoVwhvSg== Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 10:53:23 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Dan Williams , Linux Kernel Mailing List , X86 ML , Peter Zijlstra , Paul McKenney , john.stultz@linaro.org, acme@redhat.com, frederic@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Marc Zyngier , daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, Dave Hansen , Ard Biesheuvel , Will Deacon , Mark Brown Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] Documentation/process: Add subsystem/tree handbook Message-ID: <20201217105323.4d882a7d@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20201217150537.GC23634@zn.tnic> References: <20181107171010.421878737@linutronix.de> <20181107124855.328133e7@lwn.net> <20181108074920.4c601ee3@lwn.net> <20201217150537.GC23634@zn.tnic> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 16:05:37 +0100 Borislav Petkov wrote: > So, that thing. > > I have this ontop of 5.10 along with most comments integrated. > > Now, I'm thinking if I start sending those pieces which belong into the > main process documentation, the bikeshedding that is going to ensue is > going to be insane. And we have day jobs too, you know. :) > > Thus, I'm also thinking that I should do this piecemeal and once we've > all agreed on one aspect and you've applied it, Jon, I'll carve out and > send the next. Rinse and repeat. > > How does that sound, makes sense? Gee...a response from a two-year-old thread...it's taking me a while to page all of that back in :) I'd love to see this work get in, I still feel bad about my part in stalling it before. Piecemeal could certainly work, or we could just try the whole thing and see what happens. We got Thorsten's reporting-issues tome in without much trouble, after all, and that's bikeshed territory if anything is. But whatever works is fine; send stuff and I'll gladly look at it. Thanks, jon