All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] blk-mq: Always complete remote completions requests in softirq
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:43:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201217164308.ueki3scv3oxt4uta@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201208131319.GB22219@infradead.org>

On 2020-12-08 13:13:19 [+0000], Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 04:52:57PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 12/4/20 12:13 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > Controllers with multiple queues have their IRQ-handelers pinned to a
> > > CPU. The core shouldn't need to complete the request on a remote CPU.
> > > 
> > > Remove this case and always raise the softirq to complete the request.
> > 
> > I don't like this one at all, it'll add a softirq jump for the fast path
> > for eg nvme devices.
> 
> For the real fast path, that is either a polled queue or irq driven
> queues that only map to a single CPU we are never reaching this code,
> so I'm not too worried.  Not that I'd complain about numbers, preferably
> in the commit log.

Did Daniel provide all the numbers you/Jens were looking for or do we
still wait for some?

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-17 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-04 19:13 [PATCH 0/3 v2] blk-mq: Don't complete in IRQ, use llist_head Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-04 19:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: Don't complete on a remote CPU in force threaded mode Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-08 13:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-04 19:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-mq: Always complete remote completions requests in softirq Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-07 23:52   ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-08  8:22     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-08  8:44       ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-08 11:36         ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-08 11:49           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-08 12:41             ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-08 12:52               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-08 12:57                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-08 13:27                   ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-17 16:45         ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-17 16:49           ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-17 16:54             ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-08 13:13     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-17 16:43       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2020-12-17 16:55         ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-17 16:58           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-17 17:05             ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-17 18:16           ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-17 18:22             ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-17 18:41               ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-17 18:46                 ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-17 19:07                   ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-17 19:13                     ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-17 19:15                       ` Daniel Wagner
2020-12-04 19:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Use llist_head for blk_cpu_done Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-08 13:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-08 13:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-14 20:20     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-23 20:10 [PATCH v3 0/3] blk-mq: Don't complete in IRQ, use llist_head Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-mq: Always complete remote completions requests in softirq Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25  7:10   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-01-25  8:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25  8:30       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25  8:32         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25  9:29           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-25  8:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-25  8:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-27 11:22   ` Daniel Wagner
2020-10-28  6:56 [PATCH RFC] blk-mq: Don't IPI requests on PREEMPT_RT Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-28 14:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: Don't complete on a remote CPU in force threaded mode Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-10-28 14:12   ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-mq: Always complete remote completions requests in softirq Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201217164308.ueki3scv3oxt4uta@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.